case: (Default)
Case ([personal profile] case) wrote in [community profile] fandomsecrets2015-01-04 03:55 pm

[ SECRET POST #2923 ]


⌈ Secret Post #2923 ⌋

Warning: Some secrets are NOT worksafe and may contain SPOILERS.

01.


__________________________________________________



02.


__________________________________________________



03.


__________________________________________________



04.


__________________________________________________



05.


__________________________________________________



06.


__________________________________________________



07.


__________________________________________________



08.


__________________________________________________



09.











Notes:

Secrets Left to Post: 03 pages, 065 secrets from Secret Submission Post #418.
Secrets Not Posted: [ 0 - broken links ], [ 0 - not!secrets ], [ 0 - not!fandom ], [ 0 - too big ], [ 0 - repeat ].
Current Secret Submissions Post: here.
Suggestions, comments, and concerns should go here.

(Anonymous) 2015-01-05 01:04 am (UTC)(link)
Well, duh. Everybody looks at content. The problem lies when you (general) get snappy because somebody doesn't post content you like or consider worthwhile.

OP didn't say what content they created. They just said they felt like they were contributing and it made them feel happy. Then a bunch of anons come in and demand what OP is contributing and questioning the quality of said contributions (which they know nothing about). *That* is what I was telling

OP could be creating the most in-depth meta in the history of meta. Or they they be reposting nothing bu cat memes. Both are content and both have their audiences and if the OP has found their audience, then the OP is doing just fine, IMO.