[ SECRET POST #2924 ]

[case]

⌈ Secret Post #2924 ⌋

Warning: Some secrets are NOT worksafe and may contain SPOILERS.

01.


__________________________________________________



02.


__________________________________________________



03.


__________________________________________________



04.


__________________________________________________



05.


__________________________________________________



06.


__________________________________________________



07.


__________________________________________________



08.


__________________________________________________



09.











Notes:

Secrets Left to Post: 03 pages, 055 secrets from Secret Submission Post #418.
Secrets Not Posted: [ 0 - broken links ], [ 0 - not!secrets ], [ 0 - not!fandom ], [ 0 - too big ], [ 0 - repeat ], [ 1 - take it to comments ].
Current Secret Submissions Post: here.
Suggestions, comments, and concerns should go here.

Comments

[(Anonymous)]

I do not understand how you feel a CNTW is alienating potential readers. I feel it is *alerting* potential readers. That IS your warning - there will be no specific warnings, there is one big-ass warning.

I may be misunderstanding you, but I feel as if you are saying that CNTW is not good enough for you, as you still seem to be casting aspersions upon those who use it. Maybe I'm not following you, but that's what I'm getting from "when you look at the reasoning behind it, it always amounts to the person being totally full of themselves."

[(Anonymous)]

you're aliening readers because a lot of people will skip your work with a warning like that. a LOT of people. whereas if you actually put specific warnings, like for, say, non-con, some of those people who would have otherwise skipped will choose to read it because they like, or don't mind, non-con.

i'm not saying they aren't good enough. i have literally NO idea where you got that, but hey, whatever. i'm saying there there is no reason to use that "warning" because the only thing it can possibly do is prevent somebody from reading your fic, not actually invite them to read it.

NAYRT

[(Anonymous)]

And.. people skipping my work is fine with me. I originally write for myself. Then I put it in the wide world to attract others who are possibly interested in what I am interested in, and have similar views to myself. That's how I make friends. It's a good common ground. If someone is so sensitive that a common fictional occurrence or plot device will give them flashbacks they can't deal with.. then that's fine. But as a friend, I would be constantly walking on eggshells around them, and that's not fun.

So, you want to hang with me at my party, yay! If you don't because I Choose Not to Warn? That's fine, and hope you find something more to your taste. :)

Re: NAYRT

[(Anonymous)]

that's perfectly fine if that's what you want to do.

i would just like to point out that for a lot of people, it's not about triggers. it's just about putting time into something. not everyone has endless hours to read every fanfic they come across, so tagging your stuff is just a way of helping people filter out stuff they really aren't going to like. but yeah, your choice makes sense for you, i just hope that everyone realizes this isn't just an issue of triggering.

Re: NAYRT

[(Anonymous)]

This whole "but it saves time!" argument feels pretty weaksauce to me. How long do you have to read something before you figure out you don't like it? I've never finished Moby Dick. I didn't spend hours on it before realizing it wasn't for me and putting the book down.

Reading fic isn't a necessity of life, so arguing that it should be made super easy for you is like arguing that someone should carry you up Mt. Everest because you don't have the time to hike it yourself.