case: (Default)
Case ([personal profile] case) wrote in [community profile] fandomsecrets2015-01-06 06:39 pm

[ SECRET POST #2925 ]


⌈ Secret Post #2925 ⌋

Warning: Some secrets are NOT worksafe and may contain SPOILERS.

01.


__________________________________________________



02.


__________________________________________________



03.


__________________________________________________



04.


__________________________________________________



05.


__________________________________________________



06.


__________________________________________________



07.


__________________________________________________



08.


__________________________________________________



09.











Notes:

Secrets Left to Post: 02 pages, 046 secrets from Secret Submission Post #418.
Secrets Not Posted: [ 0 - broken links ], [ 0 - not!secrets ], [ 0 - not!fandom ], [ 0 - too big ], [ 0 - repeat ].
Current Secret Submissions Post: here.
Suggestions, comments, and concerns should go here.
philstar22: (Default)

Re: Good Adaptions

[personal profile] philstar22 2015-01-07 04:47 am (UTC)(link)
Okay, but the point still remains. Taking someone else's world and completely changing it in order to get your pet message across still makes for a bad adaption. In the Oz book, there was no hint of that racism against animals. It was added into Wicked.

I'm all for giving villains a background and making them more complex, but not if you change the setting and the way things work in that world in the process. It is totally possible to give a villain a backstory without doing that. And I personally have a big problem with published authors taking that much liberty with someone else's world and characters.