[ SECRET POST #2926 ]

[case]

⌈ Secret Post #2926 ⌋

Warning: Some secrets are NOT worksafe and may contain SPOILERS.

01.


__________________________________________________



02.


__________________________________________________



03.


__________________________________________________



04.


__________________________________________________



05.


__________________________________________________



06.


__________________________________________________



07.


__________________________________________________



08.


__________________________________________________



09.











Notes:

Secrets Left to Post: 02 pages, 036 secrets from Secret Submission Post #418.
Secrets Not Posted: [ 0 - broken links ], [ 0 - not!secrets ], [ 0 - not!fandom ], [ 0 - too big ], [ 1 - repeat ].
Current Secret Submissions Post: here.
Suggestions, comments, and concerns should go here.

Comments

[(Anonymous)]

Which is hilarious, because isn't it kind of the point that every single character is problematic?

[diet_poison]

I think there's "problematic" as in "this character is an awful who does awful things" and then there's "problematic" as in "the way this character is written underlies/promotes some kind of bigotry or other social problem", and I don't think the first use of that word is actually correct. Characters in GoT are supposed to be assholes. (Not that none of them are problematic, but it's possible to write a bigoted or otherwise awful character in a way that is not problematic)

[(Anonymous)]

Pretty much this. For example, Cersei is a complete bitch. But I wouldn't say her character is problematic.

[cbrachyrhynchos]

For example, Book of the New Sun, where the protagonist is supposed to be a monster, vs. Lovecraft or Burroughs who have significant problems with implicit racism.