Case (
case) wrote in
fandomsecrets2015-01-07 06:28 pm
[ SECRET POST #2926 ]
⌈ Secret Post #2926 ⌋
Warning: Some secrets are NOT worksafe and may contain SPOILERS.
01.

__________________________________________________
02.

__________________________________________________
03.

__________________________________________________
04.

__________________________________________________
05.

__________________________________________________
06.

__________________________________________________
07.

__________________________________________________
08.

__________________________________________________
09.

Notes:
Secrets Left to Post: 02 pages, 036 secrets from Secret Submission Post #418.
Secrets Not Posted: [ 0 - broken links ], [ 0 - not!secrets ], [ 0 - not!fandom ], [ 0 - too big ], [ 1 - repeat ].
Current Secret Submissions Post: here.
Suggestions, comments, and concerns should go here.

Re: Fandom/fic trends that annoy you
Yes, some characters like to go around going, "By the way, have I mentioned I'm heterosexual? Man, I am SO heterosexual. Like, the very IDEA of queerness makes me curl in a fetal position." But a lot of them just don't state it, because it just doesn't come up.
It doesn't seem OOC to me to have a character be queer if they just NEVER express a sexual preference in canon at all?
Then again, pretty much all my friends these days are queer, so in my case, yeah, actually, if you made a show about my social life, it would be the Rainbow Brigade, only you might not know it because we'd be busy making art or having meltdowns.
Re: Fandom/fic trends that annoy you
(Anonymous) 2015-01-08 02:49 am (UTC)(link)It just depends on the situation, but honestly, most characters DO express a sexual preference in canon. If they have a relationship with someone of the opposite sex, or express interest in somebody of the opposite sex, statistically speaking they are very likely straight. And they're certainly going to be perceived that way, because bisexuality is much rarer than homosexuality, which is already uncommon. So having one of those characters be bisexual is one thing, I can buy that, but several is just ridiculous. There just aren't that many statistically, so IMO you're going into bizarre territory that doesn't hold up to canon. And yeah, queer people do form communities, so you're going to find larger ratios of them together socially, but not when people are randomly thrown together.
Re: Fandom/fic trends that annoy you
Uh, what? Where did you hear that, Anon? Because, um, the Kinsey Report REALLY disagrees with you. People who have some sexual experience with both sexes are MORE common than gay folks. (And in men, at least at the time of the study, guys with sexual experience with both were 46% of the population. Not exactly rare.)
And that was back in the 50s, one of the most repressed eras in the past century of US history.
Re: Fandom/fic trends that annoy you
(Anonymous) 2015-01-08 03:00 am (UTC)(link)Re: Fandom/fic trends that annoy you
"If they have a relationship with someone of the opposite sex, or express interest in somebody of the opposite sex, statistically speaking they are very likely straight."
That is factually wrong. If 46% of men in the fifties had a same-sex experience, then it is actually FOLLOWING PROBABILITY to have half your male characters have at least one same-sex experience.
So what they identify as doesn't matter. It's their ACTIONS. Which is what fanfic is mostly writing about, unless characters are specifically stating their orientation.
Also, I have brought evidence to the table. Where is yours? Because right now, it feels like you're saying, "Bisexuals shouldn't exist much in fanfic because I say so," not out of any reason, logic, or evidence.
Re: Fandom/fic trends that annoy you
(Anonymous) 2015-01-08 03:44 am (UTC)(link)So what about that isn't rare?
Re: Fandom/fic trends that annoy you
But anyway, when they have done studies of arousal, they actually found that bisexuality is more common than homosexuality.
Re: Fandom/fic trends that annoy you
(Anonymous) 2015-01-08 03:47 am (UTC)(link)