[ SECRET POST #2929 ]

[case]

⌈ Secret Post #2929 ⌋

Warning: Some secrets are NOT worksafe and may contain SPOILERS.

01.


__________________________________________________



02.


__________________________________________________



03.


__________________________________________________



04.


__________________________________________________



05.


__________________________________________________



06.


__________________________________________________



07.


__________________________________________________



08.


__________________________________________________



09.


__________________________________________________



10.


__________________________________________________



11.


__________________________________________________



12.















Notes:

Secrets Left to Post: 04 pages, 088 secrets from Secret Submission Post #419.
Secrets Not Posted: [ 0 - broken links ], [ 0 - not!secrets ], [ 0 - not!fandom ], [ 0 - too big ], [ 0 - repeat ].
Current Secret Submissions Post: here.
Suggestions, comments, and concerns should go here.

Comments

Re: Terminology question TW: everything?

[(Anonymous)]

Take this with a large amount of salt, as I am at best on the fringes of the spheres where people actually use such terms, but as far as I know, "neurodivergent" and synonyms are pretty much exclusively used for ways of thought/information processing that differ from the norm. The original use was for autism exclusively; you see it used for things like sensory processing disorder, profound giftedness, and so on now. It has nothing to do with gender, sexuality, or religion whatsoever. I haven't seen it used for things like depression, PTSD, or eating disorders much, but the usage does exist.

Re: Terminology question TW: everything?

[(Anonymous)]

That's honestly strange to me. Would someone who has profound OCD would be considered neurotypical?

Re: Terminology question TW: everything?

[(Anonymous)]

AYRT

Yes. I'm not entirely sure how the distinction is made, but I'm fairly sure OCD is not, in itself, a marker of neuroatypicality. The Wikipedia page does a fairly good job of defining it (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Neurotypical), but it's a messy term with few concrete definitions; while it's reached more common usage than terms like "demifemale", the definition is just about as fluid.

Re: Terminology question TW: everything?

[saku]

ocd falls under neurodivergence, yes

Re: Terminology question TW: everything?

[(Anonymous)]

What about trans people (I ask because GID is considered a disorder) or eating disorders or PTSD?

Re: Terminology question TW: everything?

[saku]

eh personally i dont think trans people are inherently neurodivergent. and mental disorders/illnesses are different from neurological a/typicality imo. like i would say that add/adhd and ocd are neuroatypical in nature bc they're usually neurodevelopmental . but thats just me. i think neurodivergence as a term is used too commonly to describe mental illnesses when the two arent interchangeable .