[ SECRET POST #2931 ]

[case]

⌈ Secret Post #2931 ⌋

Warning: Some secrets are NOT worksafe and may contain SPOILERS.

01.


__________________________________________________



02.


__________________________________________________



03.


__________________________________________________



04.


__________________________________________________



05.


__________________________________________________



06.


__________________________________________________



07.


__________________________________________________



08.


__________________________________________________



09.


__________________________________________________



10.


__________________________________________________



11.


__________________________________________________



12.















Notes:

Secrets Left to Post: 03 pages, 064 secrets from Secret Submission Post #419.
Secrets Not Posted: [ 0 - broken links ], [ 0 - not!secrets ], [ 0 - not!fandom ], [ 0 - too big ], [ 0 - repeat ].
Current Secret Submissions Post: here.
Suggestions, comments, and concerns should go here.

Comments

[(Anonymous)]

I could go either way. A real person on the cover doesn't turn me off but sometimes I do want to be able to picture the characters without any sort of pre-conceived notion at all of what they should look like or be like. BUT, sometimes the artwork or photo is so gorgeous that it gets me to look at the book where I otherwise wouldn't. It depends.

On the subject of book covers, I took a King Arthur class in college and the professor assigned us some modern books to look at. I don't remember how it came up but she said that a previous class had complained about a particular book before because the cover made them feel like they were carrying around a bodice-ripper book and they wrapped the book up or always carried them so the cover didn't show. :)