[ SECRET POST #2932 ]

[case]

⌈ Secret Post #2932 ⌋

Warning: Some secrets are NOT worksafe and may contain SPOILERS.

01.


__________________________________________________



02.


__________________________________________________



03.


__________________________________________________



04.


__________________________________________________



05.


__________________________________________________



06.


__________________________________________________



07.


__________________________________________________



08.


__________________________________________________



09.


__________________________________________________



10.


__________________________________________________



11.


__________________________________________________



12.


__________________________________________________



13.


__________________________________________________



14.












Notes:

Secrets Left to Post: 02 pages, 050 secrets from Secret Submission Post #419.
Secrets Not Posted: [ 0 - broken links ], [ 0 - not!secrets ], [ 0 - not!fandom ], [ 0 - too big ], [ 0 - repeat ].
Current Secret Submissions Post: here.
Suggestions, comments, and concerns should go here.

Comments

Re: For everyone wondering what the hell this is . . .

[feotakahari]

socialjusticeleague.net, the original host of "How to Be a Fan of Problematic Things." I took one look at the author's other writings and noped the hell out.

(I've also read Jezebel, but I don't actually consider it a feminist site. It's how Gawker pretends to be feminist to get clicks and ad revenue, like how Io9 pretends to be geeky and Gawker core pretends to be journalism.)

Re: For everyone wondering what the hell this is . . .

[(Anonymous)]

For geeky feminist or lady-friendly stuff, I def recommend The Mary Sue. No site is perfect, but it's definitely my favorite for pop culture stuff.

Re: For everyone wondering what the hell this is . . .

[sarillia]

As much as that article gets praised and passed around, I've always had some issues with it anyway. I don't like this dichotomy of problematic/not problematic implicit in the way it's framed.

Re: For everyone wondering what the hell this is . . .

[(Anonymous)]

I'm curious. What exactly is so racist and horrible about it? I was sifting through and it looked pretty typical tumblr grade SJ.

Re: For everyone wondering what the hell this is . . .

[feotakahari]

First off, mea culpa. I misremembered. This wasn't the site I thought was racist. It frustrated me, but not for reasons of race.

I don't really want to dig through the whole site for every stupid thing they've said, but this is a good example of the problem: http://www.socialjusticeleague.net/2012/07/separatism-and-intersectionality/

It's bad for women to ostracize men, because black women may feel more comfortable interacting with black men than with white women. That's it. That's their argument against ostracizing men, as opposed to say, how stupid it is to judge someone for their dangly bits or lack thereof. Honestly, folks like this who think they're tolerant piss me off ten times more than the gleefully intolerant folks.

Re: For everyone wondering what the hell this is . . .

[(Anonymous)]

Io9 is the only site of those metioned that is what it's supposed to be, even though it still has faux-progressive clickbait that really tempts me to vote Republican just to fuck them up. Seriously. The rest of Gawker just puts me in a rage. And I agree with most of what they say but then they go to far left and wind up in that idiot-hole that all the people who live in reality don't get near.

Re: For everyone wondering what the hell this is . . .

[feotakahari]

As a group, Gawker's all over the place. Lifehacker seems to be decent, and I actually like Kotaku. (They wear their biases on their sleeves, but that's better than faking objectivity while reporting with a slant.) Deadspin seems okay, too, although I don't get half their jokes. I like how they come down hard on athletes who've been accused of violence against women.