Case (
case) wrote in
fandomsecrets2015-01-13 06:49 pm
[ SECRET POST #2932 ]
⌈ Secret Post #2932 ⌋
Warning: Some secrets are NOT worksafe and may contain SPOILERS.
01.

__________________________________________________
02.

__________________________________________________
03.

__________________________________________________
04.

__________________________________________________
05.

__________________________________________________
06.

__________________________________________________
07.

__________________________________________________
08.

__________________________________________________
09.

__________________________________________________
10.

__________________________________________________
11.

__________________________________________________
12.

__________________________________________________
13.

__________________________________________________
14.

Notes:
Secrets Left to Post: 02 pages, 050 secrets from Secret Submission Post #419.
Secrets Not Posted: [ 0 - broken links ], [ 0 - not!secrets ], [ 0 - not!fandom ], [ 0 - too big ], [ 0 - repeat ].
Current Secret Submissions Post: here.
Suggestions, comments, and concerns should go here.

Re: Michael Fassbender
(Anonymous) 2015-01-14 07:00 am (UTC)(link)Re: Michael Fassbender
(Anonymous) 2015-01-14 09:48 am (UTC)(link)However, she later withdrew the order, and the claims altogether. There is no confirmed evidence of ANY of the abuse, no police investigation, and no further legal action. I cannot tell you whether or not Ms. Andrews' claims are true, or why she withdrew the order/claims. Is it true, or is it a vicious rumour?
Re: Michael Fassbender
(Anonymous) 2015-01-14 11:59 am (UTC)(link)Re: Michael Fassbender
Re: Michael Fassbender
(Anonymous) 2015-01-14 02:07 pm (UTC)(link)Re: Michael Fassbender
Re: Michael Fassbender
(Anonymous) 2015-01-14 04:54 pm (UTC)(link)Re: Michael Fassbender
(Anonymous) 2015-01-14 07:37 pm (UTC)(link)To put it bluntly, you're being a victim blaming shitheel.
Re: Michael Fassbender
(Anonymous) 2015-01-14 09:08 pm (UTC)(link)All I tried to do was relate the known facts of the situation to the OP who does not know anything about the allegation. And as it stands, there is nothing KNOWN to substantiate the claim. It is entirely possible the physical evidence (of the multiple alleged instances of GBH) is simply being withheld for the victim's privacy.
If it is true, I would hope that Ms. Andrews and/or any other potential victims go forward with legal action, because that is unacceptable and so is any pressure to withdraw it.