case: (Default)
Case ([personal profile] case) wrote in [community profile] fandomsecrets2015-01-13 06:49 pm

[ SECRET POST #2932 ]


⌈ Secret Post #2932 ⌋

Warning: Some secrets are NOT worksafe and may contain SPOILERS.

01.


__________________________________________________



02.


__________________________________________________



03.


__________________________________________________



04.


__________________________________________________



05.


__________________________________________________



06.


__________________________________________________



07.


__________________________________________________



08.


__________________________________________________



09.


__________________________________________________



10.


__________________________________________________



11.


__________________________________________________



12.


__________________________________________________



13.


__________________________________________________



14.












Notes:

Secrets Left to Post: 02 pages, 050 secrets from Secret Submission Post #419.
Secrets Not Posted: [ 0 - broken links ], [ 0 - not!secrets ], [ 0 - not!fandom ], [ 0 - too big ], [ 0 - repeat ].
Current Secret Submissions Post: here.
Suggestions, comments, and concerns should go here.

Re: Michael Fassbender

(Anonymous) 2015-01-14 07:00 am (UTC)(link)
Oh no, what?

Re: Michael Fassbender

(Anonymous) 2015-01-14 09:48 am (UTC)(link)
NAYRT: His ex Sunawin Andrews filed a restraining order against him in 2010 (several months after they had split), and alleged that he was violently physically abusive to her multiple times in 2009; including breaking her nose and dragging her with his car, which caused an ovarian cyst to burst, causing extreme pain.

However, she later withdrew the order, and the claims altogether. There is no confirmed evidence of ANY of the abuse, no police investigation, and no further legal action. I cannot tell you whether or not Ms. Andrews' claims are true, or why she withdrew the order/claims. Is it true, or is it a vicious rumour?

Re: Michael Fassbender

(Anonymous) 2015-01-14 11:59 am (UTC)(link)
Wow, that is really disappointing to hear. :/ It's difficult to deduce whether something like that is true, but yeah. Still really uncool to hear.
kaijinscendre: (Default)

Re: Michael Fassbender

[personal profile] kaijinscendre 2015-01-14 12:44 pm (UTC)(link)
Yeah, see if there had been any other allegations from ANY other of Fassbender's (many) GFs maybe I would believe it. But one allegation, from one person with literally no proof (broken nose + burst ovarian cyst would produce some evidence) and who dropped it for no reason?
Edited 2015-01-14 12:51 (UTC)

Re: Michael Fassbender

(Anonymous) 2015-01-14 02:07 pm (UTC)(link)
Not to mention just being dragged by a car would produce loads of physical evidence - abrasions, jacked-up joints, etc. For it only to cause an injury that could likely only be discovered (if at all) via ultrasound seems mighty fishy.
kaijinscendre: (Default)

Re: Michael Fassbender

[personal profile] kaijinscendre 2015-01-14 02:30 pm (UTC)(link)
A broken nose would be immediately evident. And they last quite a while.

Re: Michael Fassbender

(Anonymous) 2015-01-14 04:54 pm (UTC)(link)
Definitely. Crooked nose, probably two black eyes...

Re: Michael Fassbender

(Anonymous) 2015-01-14 07:37 pm (UTC)(link)
Yep. And the woman who first came forward about Bill Cosby all those years ago also withdrew her claim against him. Funny how all these years later the truth came out, isn't it?

To put it bluntly, you're being a victim blaming shitheel.

Re: Michael Fassbender

(Anonymous) 2015-01-14 09:08 pm (UTC)(link)
No, I realize that, and I'm sorry if you think I did not! Victims are pressured to withdraw their claims all the time and it is a terrible situation. That is doubly true when the abuser is a public figure.

All I tried to do was relate the known facts of the situation to the OP who does not know anything about the allegation. And as it stands, there is nothing KNOWN to substantiate the claim. It is entirely possible the physical evidence (of the multiple alleged instances of GBH) is simply being withheld for the victim's privacy.

If it is true, I would hope that Ms. Andrews and/or any other potential victims go forward with legal action, because that is unacceptable and so is any pressure to withdraw it.