[ SECRET POST #2936 ]

[case]

⌈ Secret Post #2936 ⌋

Warning: Some secrets are NOT worksafe and may contain SPOILERS.

01.


__________________________________________________



02.


__________________________________________________



03.


__________________________________________________



04.


__________________________________________________



05.


__________________________________________________



06.


__________________________________________________



07.


__________________________________________________



08.


__________________________________________________



09.


__________________________________________________



10.














Notes:

Secrets Left to Post: 03 pages, 066 secrets from Secret Submission Post #420.
Secrets Not Posted: [ 0 - broken links ], [ 0 - not!secrets ], [ 0 - not!fandom ], [ 0 - too big ], [ 0 - repeat ], [ 1 - text secret ].
Current Secret Submissions Post: here.
Suggestions, comments, and concerns should go here.

Comments

Re: Should we stop weak-manning arguments?

[(Anonymous)]

Yeah, that might be a good way of thinking about it (re: composition fallacy).

It's definitely an intensely frustrating argument when people use it against positions I agree with. On the other hand, I'm not sure that I agree with the last part of your post. What about a situation where a group has some members that are moderate and reasonable but the actions of the group as a whole do not reflect their values? What if, I guess, the weak-man case is actually valid?

Bahhhhhh. All this 'trying to argue fairly' stuff is for the birds.