case: (Default)
Case ([personal profile] case) wrote in [community profile] fandomsecrets2015-01-17 03:26 pm

[ SECRET POST #2936 ]


⌈ Secret Post #2936 ⌋

Warning: Some secrets are NOT worksafe and may contain SPOILERS.

01.


__________________________________________________



02.


__________________________________________________



03.


__________________________________________________



04.


__________________________________________________



05.


__________________________________________________



06.


__________________________________________________



07.


__________________________________________________



08.


__________________________________________________



09.


__________________________________________________



10.














Notes:

Secrets Left to Post: 03 pages, 066 secrets from Secret Submission Post #420.
Secrets Not Posted: [ 0 - broken links ], [ 0 - not!secrets ], [ 0 - not!fandom ], [ 0 - too big ], [ 0 - repeat ], [ 1 - text secret ].
Current Secret Submissions Post: here.
Suggestions, comments, and concerns should go here.
philstar22: (Default)

Re: AUs

[personal profile] philstar22 2015-01-18 01:05 pm (UTC)(link)
Is divergent timelines the term generally used? Because I've mostly seen AUs to describe both. And I like the kind of AU where events in canon are slightly changed, but not the kind where the characters are placed in a completely different universe.
ketita: (Default)

Re: AUs

[personal profile] ketita 2015-01-18 01:39 pm (UTC)(link)
I think that while they both fall under the AU umbrella, a sub-category of it is Canon Divergence (it's got a few names).
And I agree with you - I really love AUs that change canon just a little, or who change one event and then see what would happen to the story, that kind of thing. It's the entirely different universe that 95% of the time I simply find boring.
Either way, canon divergence or similar is useful exactly because there are a lot of people who might like that but who wouldn't like the other kind of AU.