case: (Default)
Case ([personal profile] case) wrote in [community profile] fandomsecrets2015-01-18 03:36 pm

[ SECRET POST #2937 ]


⌈ Secret Post #2937 ⌋

Warning: Some secrets are NOT worksafe and may contain SPOILERS.

01.


__________________________________________________



02.


__________________________________________________



03.


__________________________________________________



04.


__________________________________________________



05.


__________________________________________________



06.


__________________________________________________



07.


__________________________________________________



08.


__________________________________________________



09.


__________________________________________________



10.














Notes:

Secrets Left to Post: 03 pages, 056 secrets from Secret Submission Post #420.
Secrets Not Posted: [ 0 - broken links ], [ 0 - not!secrets ], [ 0 - not!fandom ], [ 0 - too big ], [ 0 - repeat ].
Current Secret Submissions Post: here.
Suggestions, comments, and concerns should go here.
feotakahari: (Default)

[personal profile] feotakahari 2015-01-18 09:39 pm (UTC)(link)
Hmm, I actually have to think about this one.

I wouldn't say that futa makes a character "the man." Genitals don't determine gender, as anyone who's trans will tell you. And bottoming doesn't make a character "the woman." But when you write characters who're biologically predisposed to bottoming, meant for bottoming for childbearing purposes . . . Well, that does match up to how really creepy guys write women.

I guess I'm approaching this differently than the anon. They're going "Call these characters female!" I'm going "It's fucked-up and disturbing when you call these characters female, so it doesn't stop being fucked-up and disturbing when you call these characters male."

(Nyxelestia is going to kill me for this. I tried reading your fic, I really did. I lasted five paragraphs before feeling like I was gonna throw up.)