case: (Default)
Case ([personal profile] case) wrote in [community profile] fandomsecrets2015-01-18 03:36 pm

[ SECRET POST #2937 ]


⌈ Secret Post #2937 ⌋

Warning: Some secrets are NOT worksafe and may contain SPOILERS.

01.


__________________________________________________



02.


__________________________________________________



03.


__________________________________________________



04.


__________________________________________________



05.


__________________________________________________



06.


__________________________________________________



07.


__________________________________________________



08.


__________________________________________________



09.


__________________________________________________



10.














Notes:

Secrets Left to Post: 03 pages, 056 secrets from Secret Submission Post #420.
Secrets Not Posted: [ 0 - broken links ], [ 0 - not!secrets ], [ 0 - not!fandom ], [ 0 - too big ], [ 0 - repeat ].
Current Secret Submissions Post: here.
Suggestions, comments, and concerns should go here.

(Anonymous) 2015-01-18 10:21 pm (UTC)(link)
"You seem to be grabbing for scientific definitions of male and female sex"

Except…they totally do?

I'm not getting any funding for breast cancer research if I'm using male mice. I can tell you that with great certainty.

Societal definition doesn't have to equal biological definition but that doesn't mean the biological definition doesn't exist.

(Anonymous) 2015-01-19 03:01 am (UTC)(link)
Except that's a terrible example because if you were studying breast cancer in men you'd probably be using male mice.

I'm saying you're confusing chromosomal sex, gonadal sex, morphological sex, and phenotypic sex.

(Anonymous) 2015-01-19 02:40 pm (UTC)(link)
Men get breast cancer, sweetums.

Know-it-alls suck. Know-it-alls who don't actually know what they're talking about it suck even more.