Case (
case) wrote in
fandomsecrets2015-01-18 03:36 pm
[ SECRET POST #2937 ]
⌈ Secret Post #2937 ⌋
Warning: Some secrets are NOT worksafe and may contain SPOILERS.
01.

__________________________________________________
02.

__________________________________________________
03.

__________________________________________________
04.

__________________________________________________
05.

__________________________________________________
06.

__________________________________________________
07.

__________________________________________________
08.

__________________________________________________
09.

__________________________________________________
10.

Notes:
Secrets Left to Post: 03 pages, 056 secrets from Secret Submission Post #420.
Secrets Not Posted: [ 0 - broken links ], [ 0 - not!secrets ], [ 0 - not!fandom ], [ 0 - too big ], [ 0 - repeat ].
Current Secret Submissions Post: here.
Suggestions, comments, and concerns should go here.

no subject
(Anonymous) 2015-01-19 12:21 am (UTC)(link)just nitpicking about semantics and watheva you assume a 'some' 'many' or 'all' in a generic statement that uses none of them.
Yes, some many do tan but not the point. It's a well known part of their culture that they generally don't and for a good reason.
No one is judging those who tan or saying that they shouldn't. Calm yo tits
no subject
You could easily say British people look younger or Swedish people look younger, IDK if we're making generic statements.
Not to mention the whole "they don't tan because they've know the ~hidden~ secrets of damaging UV light for centuries" thing. Pale skin was/is valued in both the Western and Eastern worlds because it signified wealth and not having to work outside day after day after day. Just like how tanning now signifies the ability to hand over great gobs of cash and the leisure to sit underneath a UV lamp for hours at a time.