case: (Default)
Case ([personal profile] case) wrote in [community profile] fandomsecrets2015-01-18 03:36 pm

[ SECRET POST #2937 ]


⌈ Secret Post #2937 ⌋

Warning: Some secrets are NOT worksafe and may contain SPOILERS.

01.


__________________________________________________



02.


__________________________________________________



03.


__________________________________________________



04.


__________________________________________________



05.


__________________________________________________



06.


__________________________________________________



07.


__________________________________________________



08.


__________________________________________________



09.


__________________________________________________



10.














Notes:

Secrets Left to Post: 03 pages, 056 secrets from Secret Submission Post #420.
Secrets Not Posted: [ 0 - broken links ], [ 0 - not!secrets ], [ 0 - not!fandom ], [ 0 - too big ], [ 0 - repeat ].
Current Secret Submissions Post: here.
Suggestions, comments, and concerns should go here.

(Anonymous) 2015-01-19 04:31 am (UTC)(link)
I agree, but IME part of the problem is people not realizing what they want. As in, they genuinely believe they want tough concrit, but actually they don't, or they have a misleading idea of what tough concrit actually means. If a writer thinks a tough beta is someone who's a grammar nazi, they're not going to be happy if their beta points out massive plot holes and OOCness, for example.

So while you should always ask and people should be upfront... well, that's not going to be a foolproof plan because people fool themselves.