case: (Default)
Case ([personal profile] case) wrote in [community profile] fandomsecrets2015-01-22 10:26 pm

[ SECRET POST #2941 ]


⌈ Secret Post #2941 ⌋

Warning: Some secrets are NOT worksafe and may contain SPOILERS.

01.


__________________________________________________



02.
[Assassin's Creed IV: Black Flag]


__________________________________________________



03.
[Fire Emblem: Awakening]


__________________________________________________



04.
[Hannibal, Richard Armitage]


__________________________________________________



05.
[The Hobbit]


__________________________________________________



06.


__________________________________________________



07.
[Dan and Mab's Furry Adventures]


__________________________________________________



08.


__________________________________________________



09.


__________________________________________________



10.
[Doctor Who]












Notes:

Secrets Left to Post: 01 pages, 015 secrets from Secret Submission Post #420.
Secrets Not Posted: [ 0 - broken links ], [ 1 - not!secrets ], [ 0 - not!fandom ], [ 0 - too big ], [ 0 - repeat ].
Current Secret Submissions Post: here.
Suggestions, comments, and concerns should go here.
lunabee34: (Default)

[personal profile] lunabee34 2015-01-23 03:31 pm (UTC)(link)
It does make sense. I agree wholeheartedly with everything you've written here.

I think I just have a knee jerk reaction to the vehemence with which the "mere female love interest" is decried in a way that I rarely ever see happen with male characters. I also think I'm watching/reading things through entirely different lenses that many people because when these kinds of discussions start, my reaction to being told that a female character is a mere love interest usually goes something like, "What do you mean? She does this thing and this thing. And that things. She does more things than these seven other male characters. Bah!" LOL