[ SECRET POST #2942 ]

[case]

⌈ Secret Post #2942 ⌋

Warning: Some secrets are NOT worksafe and may contain SPOILERS.

01.


__________________________________________________



02.
(Marvel's Agents of Shield)


__________________________________________________



03.
[Maleficent]


__________________________________________________



04.
[Harry Potter]


__________________________________________________



05.
[Stargate Atlantis]


__________________________________________________



06.
[Five Nights at Freddy's]


__________________________________________________



07.


__________________________________________________




08. [ SPOILERS for this ]



__________________________________________________



09. [ SPOILERS for Dragon Age: Inquisition ]



__________________________________________________



10. [ SPOILERS for One Way Heroics ]



__________________________________________________


11. [ SPOILERS for Homestuck ]



__________________________________________________



12. [ WARNING for dub-con ]

(Agents of Shield)


__________________________________________________



13. [ WARNING for underage ]
http://i.imgur.com/DKM7EXF.png
[Girlish Grimoire: Littlewitch Romanesque, linked for (animated) porn, underage]














Notes:

Secrets Left to Post: 00 pages, 000 secrets from Secret Submission Post #420.
Secrets Not Posted: [ 0 - broken links ], [ 1 - not!secrets ], [ 0 - not!fandom ], [ 0 - too big ], [ 0 - repeat ].
Current Secret Submissions Post: here.
Suggestions, comments, and concerns should go here.

Comments

[(Anonymous)]

how do you feel about guro or nom-con then? what about violent video games?

in your opinion, should fictional sexualization reflect 100% what is safe, sane, and consensual in real life?

[(Anonymous)]

NA but I'm not sure how useful this kind of argument is, in cases where someone is already saying that there's a bright line somewhere. Because it feels like it's just quibbling over where the line should be drawn.

That said, I would argue that there's a distinction between fantasies and depictions of fantasies that involve things that aren't safe, sane, and consensual, but which can be imagined in ways that aren't harmful, and things where the object of the kink is just intrinsically out of bounds. It's not so much that depiction of immoral things is always wrong, so much as the specific nature of the thing we're talking about here. You can have a BDSM lifestyle that works consensually while still dealing with a lot of those fantasies; you can't have a being-attracted-to-12-year-olds lifestyle that does that.

(and, to be clear here, I think that's a fundamentally different thing than, like, age-play)

[(Anonymous)]

"imagined in a way that isn't harmful"

idk, a lot of morally awful kinks are ways for some victims to cope or it's imagined in a way that's different from what other people outside the kink would think. like with loli/shota, it's apparently way more common for people to self insert as the loli/shota instead of the faceless man or whatever. just because that sort of thing makes me as uncomfortable as hell doesn't mean i think it should be taken away.

[(Anonymous)]

>> it's apparently way more common for people to self insert as the loli/shota instead of the faceless man

THIS! I used to read loli/shota and still read rape hentao. I always identified with the victim.

[(Anonymous)]

That's... totally not answering what anon asked.

[(Anonymous)]

Reading about shota does not mean you actually are attracted to 12 year old boys, you realise that.

Like reading about non-con does not make you think GEE SURE WISH SOMEONE WOULD COME RAPE ME RIGHT NOW when you're outside.

[(Anonymous)]

Violent games and movies should be banned. Killing someone is objectively wrong and ISIS will show their recruits scum like this as instructions.

[insanenoodlyguy]

the death of expression is a greater threat then ISIS will ever be.

[(Anonymous)]

"nom-con"

lol

[a_potato]

Consensual eating.