[ SECRET POST #2942 ]

[case]

⌈ Secret Post #2942 ⌋

Warning: Some secrets are NOT worksafe and may contain SPOILERS.

01.


__________________________________________________



02.
(Marvel's Agents of Shield)


__________________________________________________



03.
[Maleficent]


__________________________________________________



04.
[Harry Potter]


__________________________________________________



05.
[Stargate Atlantis]


__________________________________________________



06.
[Five Nights at Freddy's]


__________________________________________________



07.


__________________________________________________




08. [ SPOILERS for this ]



__________________________________________________



09. [ SPOILERS for Dragon Age: Inquisition ]



__________________________________________________



10. [ SPOILERS for One Way Heroics ]



__________________________________________________


11. [ SPOILERS for Homestuck ]



__________________________________________________



12. [ WARNING for dub-con ]

(Agents of Shield)


__________________________________________________



13. [ WARNING for underage ]
http://i.imgur.com/DKM7EXF.png
[Girlish Grimoire: Littlewitch Romanesque, linked for (animated) porn, underage]














Notes:

Secrets Left to Post: 00 pages, 000 secrets from Secret Submission Post #420.
Secrets Not Posted: [ 0 - broken links ], [ 1 - not!secrets ], [ 0 - not!fandom ], [ 0 - too big ], [ 0 - repeat ].
Current Secret Submissions Post: here.
Suggestions, comments, and concerns should go here.

Comments

OP

[(Anonymous)]

I think it's about what you're doing with the content, not the content itself. I've written stuff about suicide, and it wasn't because I wanted to promote suicide, it was because I was working through my own issues. If you've been abused, and reading porn of abuse helps deal with that, all the more power to you. But if you're writing about abuse as something cute and fluffy . . . I dunno, maybe that can lessen the pain, but I feel like there's more risk in it than benefit.

(Of course, "this kind of porn is bad" is a completely different argument from "this kind of porn should be banned." If there's one thing to be learned from culture news, it's that you should never give a government agency the power to decide what is and isn't pornographic.)

Re: OP

[(Anonymous)]

I absolutely loathe this argument, because it leads to the environment where you have to justify every single damn thing you like, and you have to prove that it's okay for you to like it. And I'm not talking about things like shota/loli. Way more tame stuff gets it too. No one needs to justify the reasons they like their media. If they want to, sure, that's great. But they shouldn't be forced to, because real people are always more important than fictional characters, and the consumers are the real people in the equation. Depiction is not endorsement, and yes, that even includes things like "writing about abuse as something cute and fluffy." People in general severely overestimate how fictional tastes correlate to real life views, and furthermore, the level of influence that media (especially this sort of media) has.

When someone can show me an actual compelling argument that this media actually does real harm, I might change my tune. (And no, saying pedophiles like it is not an example, of course they do, and if it didn't exist, they'd just find something else. They do anyway.)