case: (Default)
Case ([personal profile] case) wrote in [community profile] fandomsecrets2015-01-25 04:07 pm

[ SECRET POST #2944 ]


⌈ Secret Post #2944 ⌋

Warning: Some secrets are NOT worksafe and may contain SPOILERS.

01.


__________________________________________________



02.


__________________________________________________



03.


__________________________________________________



04.


__________________________________________________



05.


__________________________________________________



06.


__________________________________________________



07.


__________________________________________________



08.


__________________________________________________



09.


__________________________________________________



10.














Notes:

Secrets Left to Post: 03 pages, 058 secrets from Secret Submission Post #421.
Secrets Not Posted: [ 0 - broken links ], [ 0 - not!secrets ], [ 0 - not!fandom ], [ 0 - too big ], [ 0 - repeat ].
Current Secret Submissions Post: here.
Suggestions, comments, and concerns should go here.

(Anonymous) 2015-01-25 09:50 pm (UTC)(link)
I think it's easy as hell, and not necessarily wrong, to frame it that way, though.

I mean, I think that's generally the case for things of this nature, although I acknowledge it is possible that there is some specific feature of Gone Girl that makes it impossible.
insanenoodlyguy: (Default)

[personal profile] insanenoodlyguy 2015-01-25 09:56 pm (UTC)(link)
We all have our interpretations, but that one's a big fucking stretch anon.

(Anonymous) 2015-01-25 10:00 pm (UTC)(link)
Eh. Maybe.

That's definitely the way in which I've seen people talk about her on here, and it seems unlikely that it would be wildly invalid. And the great thing is it still works even if the character is flawed and fucked-up.
insanenoodlyguy: (Default)

[personal profile] insanenoodlyguy 2015-01-25 10:23 pm (UTC)(link)
You are admitting you haven't watched it, so I don't really think I can do much more then offer you a differing opinion. I disagree with these other interpretations obviously. If your interested in the character, why not watch it?

(Anonymous) 2015-01-25 10:25 pm (UTC)(link)
Because it seems kind of dour and bad

I talked more about what I think in the post below if you care (not that you really particularly should, it's all good)

(Anonymous) 2015-01-25 10:30 pm (UTC)(link)
is it? the title *is* a commentary on that very question. "Gone" Girl <- "Go" Girl... and what if she *did* really "go"?

(Anonymous) 2015-01-25 10:15 pm (UTC)(link)
Then tell me how it's right.

(Anonymous) 2015-01-25 10:18 pm (UTC)(link)
I don't think it's right. I think it's (probably) valid.

(Anonymous) 2015-01-25 10:25 pm (UTC)(link)
Then tell me how.

(Anonymous) 2015-01-25 10:32 pm (UTC)(link)
If it is acceptable to interpret the character's actions and feelings as, in any way, a reaction to an experience that is specifically a result of her gender, and her victims as in any way standing in for broader social conditions, then it is acceptable to understand the film as being about radical violence.

And this seems to be a reasonably common interpretation, at the very least.

(Anonymous) 2015-01-26 12:56 am (UTC)(link)
NAYRT

"In any way" gives you a hell of a lot of leeway.