[ SECRET POST #2945 ]

[case]

⌈ Secret Post #2945 ⌋

Warning: Some secrets are NOT worksafe and may contain SPOILERS.

01.


__________________________________________________



02.
[Not a Harem Heaven, It's a Yandere Hell]


__________________________________________________



03.
[Game of Thrones]


__________________________________________________



04.
[In the Flesh]


__________________________________________________



05.
[Hudson Leick as Callisto in Xena, Warrior Princess]


__________________________________________________



06.
[Plebcomics]


__________________________________________________



07.
[Great British Bake Off]


__________________________________________________



08.
[Captain America: The First Avenger]


__________________________________________________



09.
[Binan Koukou Chikyuu Bouei-bu LOVE!]


__________________________________________________



10.
[Queen]













Notes:

Secrets Left to Post: 02 pages, 048 secrets from Secret Submission Post #421.
Secrets Not Posted: [ 0 - broken links ], [ 0 - not!secrets ], [ 0 - not!fandom ], [ 0 - too big ], [ 0 - repeat ].
Current Secret Submissions Post: here.
Suggestions, comments, and concerns should go here.

Comments

[(Anonymous)]

Then don't compare it to rape.

Compare it to someone leaving a hundred dollars on the seat of a car that's unlocked.

Compare it to someone leaving their bank details on a park bench.

Compare it to someone getting drunk and wandering around in an area known for muggings.

You're still absolving the perpetrator of any fucked up behavior because your argument is that the other party's behavior "deserved what they got." And that is a) never okay regardless of the situation, and b) the central core of what ANY apologist's argument rests on.

You apparently not seeing that, or choosing not to in this case because it suits your argument, is far, far more fucked up.

[(Anonymous)]

The "perpetrator" in this case is her boss, who fired her for dragging her online drama to her place of work. It isn't "fucked up behavior" to fire an employee for behaving unprofessionally.

[(Anonymous)]

The "perpetrator/s" are whoever drew this to the attention of the boss in the first place, out of petty and chidish "omg someone said something on the internet I don't like!" baby-rage.

[(Anonymous)]

It sounds like both sides were assholes, but she should have known she was dealing with assholes who would act assholishly, given the immediate situation of escalating assholery. So it was just plain stupid of her to give them more ammunition.

If someone is outside my house yelling threats I am not going to unlock the door and dare them to come in and steal my stuff. They still shouldn't do it, but having demonstrated that they would it's dumb of me to make it easy for them.

[(Anonymous)]

I'd compare it more to a fight where arguing escalates and someone says "Well if you hate me so much just kill me!". If the other person does it, they are still the one to blame for it, no matter how much they were provoked.

[(Anonymous)]

SA--it's more like an argument that escalates to the point where someone says, "well if you're so big, let's see you egg my house!" and gives out their street address. The assholes who threw the eggs are still assholes, but the other people who live in the house are still going to be rightfully pissed at the moron who gave out their address.

[(Anonymous)]

Sorry, but I think getting someone fired just because you don't agree with their opinions is a bir worse than egging someone's house.

[(Anonymous)]

SA--also, since nobody was murdered, and the bad behaviour stops well short of murder, it's a little overzealous to draw that comparison. Actually killing someone is a few degrees more serious than deciding to send a nasty stupid email after someone dared you you do it.