[ SECRET POST #2946 ]

[case]

⌈ Secret Post #2946 ⌋

Warning: Some secrets are NOT worksafe and may contain SPOILERS.

01.


__________________________________________________



02.


__________________________________________________



03.


__________________________________________________



04.


__________________________________________________



05.


__________________________________________________



06.


__________________________________________________



07.


__________________________________________________



08.


__________________________________________________



09.


__________________________________________________



10.














Notes:

Secrets Left to Post: 02 pages, 038 secrets from Secret Submission Post #421.
Secrets Not Posted: [ 0 - broken links ], [ 0 - not!secrets ], [ 0 - not!fandom ], [ 0 - too big ], [ 0 - repeat ].
Current Secret Submissions Post: here.
Suggestions, comments, and concerns should go here.

Comments

[cushlamochree]

Yes, I definitely agree.

That's definitely very true of DePalma I think. Like, with The Untouchables, it's hardly a great plot or anything, but damn if that scene in the train station doesn't look amazing. Although I admit I haven't seen enough of his work to really comment.

Another director who comes to mind - and I was talking about this with potato, I think, a couple weeks ago - is Kubrick, where I feel like his movies are technically incredible and beautiful and just perfectly proportioned and balanced masterpieces, but also very empty (whereas potato really likes his films for that technical brilliance). You could also probably talk about Malick in the same terms. They both make these fascinating, beautiful, intellectual films, but I just don't ultimately agree with the basic method of it.