case: (Default)
Case ([personal profile] case) wrote in [community profile] fandomsecrets2015-01-29 06:52 pm

[ SECRET POST #2948 ]


⌈ Secret Post #2948 ⌋

Warning: Some secrets are NOT worksafe and may contain SPOILERS.

01.


__________________________________________________



02.


__________________________________________________



03.


__________________________________________________



04.


__________________________________________________



05.


__________________________________________________



06.


__________________________________________________



07.


__________________________________________________



08.


__________________________________________________



09.


__________________________________________________



10.














Notes:

Secrets Left to Post: 00 pages, 000 secrets from Secret Submission Post #421.
Secrets Not Posted: [ 0 - broken links ], [ 0 - not!secrets ], [ 0 - not!fandom ], [ 0 - too big ], [ 0 - repeat ].
Current Secret Submissions Post: here.
Suggestions, comments, and concerns should go here.

Re: Het Erasure?

(Anonymous) 2015-01-30 01:34 am (UTC)(link)
In fairness, people who want to talk about LBGT erasure do, in fact, sometimes argue that putting canon LBGT characters into het ships actually constitutes erasure

I think this is a stupid position, for much the same reasons you've outlined here, but it is a thing that people actually think

Re: Het Erasure?

(Anonymous) 2015-01-30 01:54 am (UTC)(link)
those people are literally wrong tho