[ SECRET POST #2950 ]

[case]

⌈ Secret Post #2950 ⌋

Warning: Some secrets are NOT worksafe and may contain SPOILERS.

01.


__________________________________________________



02.


__________________________________________________



03.


__________________________________________________



04.


__________________________________________________



05.


__________________________________________________



06.


__________________________________________________



07.


__________________________________________________



08.


__________________________________________________



09.


__________________________________________________



10.














Notes:

Secrets Left to Post: 03 pages, 065 secrets from Secret Submission Post #422.
Secrets Not Posted: [ 0 - broken links ], [ 0 - not!secrets ], [ 0 - not!fandom ], [ 0 - too big ], [ 0 - repeat ].
Current Secret Submissions Post: here.
Suggestions, comments, and concerns should go here.

Comments

[visp]

So, to recap, you had a sex dream about a conventionally attractive celebrity and you think that the celebrity might possibly be gay, and therefore the eeeevul SJWs would somehow take offense to the random meanderings of your subconscious?

That's... that's just dumb. You should have just said that you have the hots for a celebrity that you think might be gay, and so you are conflicted about whether or not it's okay for you (as a woman, I presume) to fantasize over him. That at least would have been vaguely plausible and interesting.

[(Anonymous)]

...pretty sure the 7th comment added did just that.

[lb_lee]

Honestly, I suspect 7th comment is a troll. My faith in humanity requires it.

NO DON'T TAKE MY DELUSIONS NOOOOOO

--Rogan

[visp]

More than a troll, I'll bet it's the OP trying to get some better mileage out of the secret.

[lb_lee]

Well, I wasn't GOING to say that, because it'd be cynical of me, but since you've said it for me...

--Rogan

[(Anonymous)]

I am not the OP or a troll. There is something called "sex-negativity" which is a reaction to the uncritical all-inclusiveness of "sex-positivity." I think it makes some good points and my take on this is influenced by it.

This explains (I know it's xojane, but it still gets to what it's all about):
http://www.xojane.com/issues/im-a-sex-negative-feminist

[insanenoodlyguy]

No, this is exactly the kind of article I'd expect to find on xojane.

[(Anonymous)]

While I can understand where sex-negative feminists come from in a theoretical sense, every time I've encountered them they've been busy shaming and blaming sexual abuse survivors (myself included) for "contributing to rape culture" for having the temerity to develop rape fantasies after having been victimized.

So yeah, sex-negative feminists can go fuck themselves. Or not.