Case (
case) wrote in
fandomsecrets2015-01-31 03:38 pm
[ SECRET POST #2950 ]
⌈ Secret Post #2950 ⌋
Warning: Some secrets are NOT worksafe and may contain SPOILERS.
01.

__________________________________________________
02.

__________________________________________________
03.

__________________________________________________
04.

__________________________________________________
05.

__________________________________________________
06.

__________________________________________________
07.

__________________________________________________
08.

__________________________________________________
09.

__________________________________________________
10.

Notes:
Secrets Left to Post: 03 pages, 065 secrets from Secret Submission Post #422.
Secrets Not Posted: [ 0 - broken links ], [ 0 - not!secrets ], [ 0 - not!fandom ], [ 0 - too big ], [ 0 - repeat ].
Current Secret Submissions Post: here.
Suggestions, comments, and concerns should go here.

Re: Fuck you Fandom secrets.
(Anonymous) 2015-01-31 10:38 pm (UTC)(link)Re: Fuck you Fandom secrets.
(Anonymous) 2015-01-31 10:44 pm (UTC)(link)In this case, asking a "reasonable" question with no intention of taking the answer to heart.
"I don't understand why women have a problem with XXX"
"*Is given answer*"
"No you're wrong"
Re: Fuck you Fandom secrets.
(Anonymous) 2015-01-31 10:50 pm (UTC)(link)And I'm being polite because it's a conversation that I'm actually interested in having and I'd rather not see it get derailed into ideological SJW / anti-SJW fuckery. Even though the chances of that happening approach 1 in a million.
If you think that things would be better served by me pretending I think things that I don't think, or calling someone a fuckhead, I guess all I can say is that I don't see your logic there. But I guess that's sea-lioning too.
Re: Fuck you Fandom secrets.
(Anonymous) 2015-01-31 10:56 pm (UTC)(link)You are correct. That whole comment was so sea-lion, I can actually smell the fish.
Re: Fuck you Fandom secrets.
(Anonymous) 2015-01-31 11:10 pm (UTC)(link)I'm laughing at you so much right now.
A+, SJWs never disappoint! Polite disagreement is now offensive! No one will beleive you're genuinely disagreeing, unless you throw a couple of fucks and call ayrt a shitlord!
Re: Fuck you Fandom secrets.
(Anonymous) 2015-01-31 10:52 pm (UTC)(link)Re: Fuck you Fandom secrets.
(Anonymous) 2015-01-31 10:46 pm (UTC)(link)There was a good Wondermark strip about how a faux-reasonable tone can be used to be really obnoxious, and some kids have adopted it because it lets them criticize reasonableness as abusive.
I was literally about to post that strip!
The strip in question (and not what you were doing at all politely disagreeing anon)
Re: I was literally about to post that strip!
(Anonymous) 2015-01-31 11:03 pm (UTC)(link)So OP posted their own thread, offended anon came into OP's thread, then offended anon accused OP of sea-lioning when offended anon is the one who is posting in OP's thread?
Is it just me or is the whole thing the opposite way around? Why post in someone else's thread and keep replying then accuse them of following you? Wtf?
Re: I was literally about to post that strip!
(Anonymous) 2015-01-31 11:05 pm (UTC)(link)Re: I was literally about to post that strip!
(Anonymous) 2015-01-31 11:06 pm (UTC)(link)Re: I was literally about to post that strip!
Re: I was literally about to post that strip!
(Anonymous) 2015-01-31 11:29 pm (UTC)(link)Re: I was literally about to post that strip!
(Anonymous) 2015-02-01 04:41 am (UTC)(link)I think that the end result they're hoping for is that there is no debate at all, and that we simply accept the rightful opinions handed down from our SJW overlords. Because they KNOW what's best.
Re: I was literally about to post that strip!
(Anonymous) 2015-01-31 11:29 pm (UTC)(link)Re: I was literally about to post that strip!
(Anonymous) 2015-01-31 11:34 pm (UTC)(link)That's why I interpreted that comic as about stalking and/or harassing, and not the tone of voice which was totally reasonable to me. Of course stalking and/or harassing is wrong, regardless of the tone you take. But the tone is irrelevant when offended anon is the one following OP and posting in their thread and it can't be called stalking and/or harassing in any way
Re: I was literally about to post that strip!
(Anonymous) 2015-02-01 10:02 am (UTC)(link)Re: I was literally about to post that strip!
(Anonymous) 2015-01-31 11:42 pm (UTC)(link)Re: I was literally about to post that strip!
(Anonymous) 2015-02-01 12:02 am (UTC)(link)Re: I was literally about to post that strip!
Obviously, anon is acting like...grass.
(Or maybe they're being a pansy?)