case: (Default)
Case ([personal profile] case) wrote in [community profile] fandomsecrets2015-02-01 03:52 pm

[ SECRET POST #2951 ]


⌈ Secret Post #2951 ⌋

Warning: Some secrets are NOT worksafe and may contain SPOILERS.

01.


__________________________________________________



02.
[The To-Do List, Brandy/Willy]


__________________________________________________



03.
[Avatar: Legend of Korra]


__________________________________________________



04.
[The Amazing World of Gumball]


__________________________________________________



05.
[Agents of Shield]


__________________________________________________



06.
[Game of Thrones]


__________________________________________________



07.
[Galavant]


__________________________________________________



08.
[Soukyuu no Fafner Exodus]


__________________________________________________



09.
[Jamie Dornan from "The Fall"]


__________________________________________________



10.
(Neil Gaiman)













Notes:

Secrets Left to Post: 03 pages, 054 secrets from Secret Submission Post #422.
Secrets Not Posted: [ 0 - broken links ], [ 1 - not!secrets ], [ 0 - not!fandom ], [ 0 - too big ], [ 0 - repeat ].
Current Secret Submissions Post: here.
Suggestions, comments, and concerns should go here.
sarillia: (Default)

[personal profile] sarillia 2015-02-01 09:57 pm (UTC)(link)
That sounds reasonable, but then we would still get into arguments about where you draw the line between a legitimate threat that should be looked into and pointless violent rhetoric.
feotakahari: (Default)

[personal profile] feotakahari 2015-02-01 10:09 pm (UTC)(link)
If there's one thing I've learned from tax law, it's that no matter where you put the line, there will always be edge cases. In general, I like to keep legal lines in the direction of letting the bad go free rather than punishing the misguided, but if they have any bite at all, a few people will still wind up on trial who shouldn't really be there. The most inportant thing is that the law gives enough flexibility for a jury to hear the facts and decide the case according to its merits.

Though to be fair to what you're saying, I think the U.S. is so free-speech right now that even harassment can be hard to punish. The line needs to go the other way right now. http://jezebel.com/the-cops-dont-care-about-violent-online-threats-what-d-1682577343 (Warning: kinda radfem, though I'm on their side this time.)