[ SECRET POST #2952 ]

[case]

⌈ Secret Post #2952 ⌋

Warning: Some secrets are NOT worksafe and may contain SPOILERS.

01.


__________________________________________________



02.
[Tales of Zestiria]


__________________________________________________



03.
[Strange Magic]


__________________________________________________



04.
[Sleepy Hollow]


__________________________________________________



05.
[Star Trek: TNG]


__________________________________________________



06.
[Person of Interest]


__________________________________________________



07.
(Dangan Ronpa)


__________________________________________________



08.
(Splash, Daryl Hannah)


__________________________________________________



09.
[Once Upon a Time]


__________________________________________________



10.
[VH1's Hindsight]













Notes:

Secrets Left to Post: 02 pages, 044 secrets from Secret Submission Post #422.
Secrets Not Posted: [ 0 - broken links ], [ 0 - not!secrets ], [ 0 - not!fandom ], [ 0 - too big ], [ 0 - repeat ].
Current Secret Submissions Post: here.
Suggestions, comments, and concerns should go here.

Comments

[(Anonymous)]

I like the use of pan = all, bi = two or more. Because I know people who may be attracted to women and trans dudes, but not trans women and men. And I've met at least three who are everything-but-cis dude.

Because I do sort of hate it gets into the snake-devouring-its-own-tail argument of "But trans men are REAL men" and "physical characteristics do play a factor in sexual attraction."

But it's been a case before if someone identifies as being exclusively attracted to women, they fall in love, later the person goes "I'm not a butch lesbian, I'm a trans man." It seems kinda assholish to go "HA! You were pansexual all along! You were secretly dating A MAN!" Without going all the way over to skeezytown with the "But they were A WOMAN and then they became A MAN." Like a freakin' pokemon evolution. And the whole weird argument that came up weeks ago about lesbians having sex with strap ons being the same as het sex and yeah. People are weird and complicated and label policing is just an exercise in frustration.

[(Anonymous)]

So much yes.

I consider myself bi, I'm not attracted to ladyboys (people with both breasts and a penis) - is that trans? But there's no problem with it otherwise as long as it was either or. So what does that make me?
My pan-sexual definition would be regardless of any appearance they feel attracted to the person.

These days I don't care about these labels though because nobody is 100% gay or 100% straight, we're all in a shade of gray - but closeminded people just need the 'safety boundaries' I guess.