case: (Default)
Case ([personal profile] case) wrote in [community profile] fandomsecrets2015-02-07 04:12 pm

[ SECRET POST #2957 ]


⌈ Secret Post #2957 ⌋

Warning: Some secrets are NOT worksafe and may contain SPOILERS.

01.


__________________________________________________



02.


__________________________________________________



03.


__________________________________________________



04.


__________________________________________________



05.


__________________________________________________



06.


__________________________________________________



07.


__________________________________________________



08.


__________________________________________________



09.


__________________________________________________



10.














Notes:

Secrets Left to Post: 03 pages, 064 secrets from Secret Submission Post #423.
Secrets Not Posted: [ 0 - broken links ], [ 0 - not!secrets ], [ 0 - not!fandom ], [ 0 - too big ], [ 0 - repeat ].
Current Secret Submissions Post: here.
Suggestions, comments, and concerns should go here.

(Anonymous) 2015-02-07 09:31 pm (UTC)(link)
Thank you for the middle ground. It's not "canon" and "obvious". But nor is it something totally insane that fangirls pulled out of nowhere. It's a legitimate reading and one could easily make a compelling argument for it, but it's not canon. (and it's not.... not-canon either)

I'm a casual Sherlock fan, and the extremes on both side make me glad I don't delve into fandom.
dreemyweird: (austere)

[personal profile] dreemyweird 2015-02-07 11:01 pm (UTC)(link)
Yeah, it's certainly not insane nor out of the left field. I mean, there are still disagreements on just how textually plausible this is (and e.g. in my reading, it's basically a text-based fanon, not a plausible headcanon), but I've seen some interesting arguments in favour of canonical H/W.