case: (Default)
Case ([personal profile] case) wrote in [community profile] fandomsecrets2015-02-07 04:12 pm

[ SECRET POST #2957 ]


⌈ Secret Post #2957 ⌋

Warning: Some secrets are NOT worksafe and may contain SPOILERS.

01.


__________________________________________________



02.


__________________________________________________



03.


__________________________________________________



04.


__________________________________________________



05.


__________________________________________________



06.


__________________________________________________



07.


__________________________________________________



08.


__________________________________________________



09.


__________________________________________________



10.














Notes:

Secrets Left to Post: 03 pages, 064 secrets from Secret Submission Post #423.
Secrets Not Posted: [ 0 - broken links ], [ 0 - not!secrets ], [ 0 - not!fandom ], [ 0 - too big ], [ 0 - repeat ].
Current Secret Submissions Post: here.
Suggestions, comments, and concerns should go here.

(Anonymous) 2015-02-08 01:09 am (UTC)(link)
I don't think it is. Tbh, I think it's sexual people inherently misunderstanding how anyone asexual can love. Because it's so ingrained in them that sex is an expression of love (and a lot of religious ideals don't help that, since we're bombarded by love = sex and sexual attraction by both religion and media).

I think more people need to sit and re-evaluate why sexual attraction is 100% necessary in their definition of romance.

(Anonymous) 2015-02-08 11:54 am (UTC)(link)
It isn't that sex is absolutely necessary for romance. But sexual attraction is.