case: (Default)
Case ([personal profile] case) wrote in [community profile] fandomsecrets2015-02-10 07:00 pm
  • Add Memory
  • Share This Entry

[ SECRET POST #2960 ]


⌈ Secret Post #2960 ⌋

Warning: Some secrets are NOT worksafe and may contain SPOILERS.

01.


__________________________________________________



02.


__________________________________________________



03.


__________________________________________________



04.


__________________________________________________



05.


__________________________________________________



06.


__________________________________________________



07.


__________________________________________________



08.


__________________________________________________



09.


__________________________________________________



10.














Notes:

Better early than late!

Secrets Left to Post: 02 pages, 034 secrets from Secret Submission Post #423.
Secrets Not Posted: [ 0 - broken links ], [ 0 - not!secrets ], [ 0 - not!fandom ], [ 0 - too big ], [ 0 - repeat ].
Current Secret Submissions Post: here.
Suggestions, comments, and concerns should go here.
Flat | Top-Level Comments Only

(Anonymous) 2015-02-11 03:29 am (UTC)(link)
And you have a magical toaster than is never going to break or need replacing, do you?

(Anonymous) 2015-02-11 03:33 am (UTC)(link)
What does that have to do with owning the original toaster? The fact it's broken doesn't mean you don't still own it.

(Anonymous) 2015-02-11 03:37 am (UTC)(link)
Because if it breaks, you can't start cloning it if it's been discontinued.

Because if a fic is gone from the internet, you have no rights whatsoever when it comes to that decision.

(Anonymous) 2015-02-11 03:40 am (UTC)(link)
Having a copy of something isn't the same as distributing it or taking away a person's right to take down a fic.

(Anonymous) 2015-02-11 03:42 am (UTC)(link)
Come back to me when you've learned something about IP law.

(Anonymous) 2015-02-11 03:47 am (UTC)(link)
Come back to me when you can explain how I'm distributing the book that's sitting on my coffee table by owning that particular copy of it.

(Anonymous) 2015-02-11 03:48 am (UTC)(link)
Copy =/= duplicating.

(Anonymous) 2015-02-11 03:51 am (UTC)(link)
...right? Where did I say anything about duplicating products?

(Anonymous) 2015-02-11 03:53 am (UTC)(link)
...reread the thread, maybe?

(Anonymous) 2015-02-11 03:54 am (UTC)(link)
I have been talking the entire time about having a copy of something. I never said anything about distributing or duplicating something.

(Anonymous) 2015-02-11 03:57 am (UTC)(link)
Yes, you have been talking this entire time, haven't you.

...and you have a problem with the person who said that the idea of someone having a copy they COULD distribute made them uncomfortable.

(Anonymous) 2015-02-11 04:02 am (UTC)(link)
That first line made me crack up, so there's that.

I COULD duplicate the book in front of me and distribute it. Or, to use an example of something it would be easier to do that with, I COULD duplicate some of the music files I have on my computer and distribute them. But the fact I could do those things doesn't mean people shouldn't be allowed to have books or buy music digitally.
Flat | Top-Level Comments Only