case: (Default)
Case ([personal profile] case) wrote in [community profile] fandomsecrets2015-02-10 07:00 pm

[ SECRET POST #2960 ]


⌈ Secret Post #2960 ⌋

Warning: Some secrets are NOT worksafe and may contain SPOILERS.

01.


__________________________________________________



02.


__________________________________________________



03.


__________________________________________________



04.


__________________________________________________



05.


__________________________________________________



06.


__________________________________________________



07.


__________________________________________________



08.


__________________________________________________



09.


__________________________________________________



10.














Notes:

Better early than late!

Secrets Left to Post: 02 pages, 034 secrets from Secret Submission Post #423.
Secrets Not Posted: [ 0 - broken links ], [ 0 - not!secrets ], [ 0 - not!fandom ], [ 0 - too big ], [ 0 - repeat ].
Current Secret Submissions Post: here.
Suggestions, comments, and concerns should go here.

(Anonymous) 2015-02-11 03:30 am (UTC)(link)
See, yes something can be done.

People can show a little bit of fucking respect and a little less "I want it therefore I can take it and fuck anyone else" entitlement.

(Anonymous) 2015-02-11 03:36 am (UTC)(link)
You are not entitled to respect any more than someone is entitled to a story.

(Anonymous) 2015-02-11 03:38 am (UTC)(link)
Where did I say I thought I was?

I am, however, fully entitled to treat those who show disrespect with the contempt their behavior deserves.

(Anonymous) 2015-02-11 03:43 am (UTC)(link)
It's all over everything that you're saying, that something is wrong if you think it's disrespectful, that you have some sort of right not to be disrespected. Creators are as entitled and sniveling as consumers. They think they're special and that they've done something special. But other people can do the exact same thing that you can, and a lot of the times, they can do it better.

(Anonymous) 2015-02-11 03:48 am (UTC)(link)
LOL, wow there's a whole heap of bitterness in you, isn't there?

(Anonymous) 2015-02-11 03:49 am (UTC)(link)
Only matched by yours.

(Anonymous) 2015-02-11 03:51 am (UTC)(link)
Please show me how citing facts and dismissing misinformation makes anyone bitter.

(Anonymous) 2015-02-11 03:50 am (UTC)(link)
And that's typical, isn't it? Anyone who dares to criticize is "jealous" or "bitter." It's a good diversionary tactic, but it's transparent.

(Anonymous) 2015-02-11 03:52 am (UTC)(link)
Almost as typical as descending to adhominem attacks and wild personal assumptions when you can't actually argue against facts.

(Anonymous) 2015-02-11 03:56 am (UTC)(link)
You took that bent from the outset, and twisted everything I said to fit some argument you thought I was making.

(Anonymous) 2015-02-11 03:59 am (UTC)(link)
....what?

You make factually incorrect comments, I correct you. You make illogical derailments, I ask how that's even relevant.

Please, tell me, how does that twist anything?

...LOL, and you accuse me of diversionary tactics?

(Anonymous) 2015-02-11 04:05 am (UTC)(link)
You somehow twisted "if someone has a product, the person who made the product shouldn't be allowed to take it back" into "if you possess a product, you should be able to distribute it" and "writers shouldn't be allowed to stop distributing their work."