case: (Default)
Case ([personal profile] case) wrote in [community profile] fandomsecrets2015-02-10 07:00 pm

[ SECRET POST #2960 ]


⌈ Secret Post #2960 ⌋

Warning: Some secrets are NOT worksafe and may contain SPOILERS.

01.


__________________________________________________



02.


__________________________________________________



03.


__________________________________________________



04.


__________________________________________________



05.


__________________________________________________



06.


__________________________________________________



07.


__________________________________________________



08.


__________________________________________________



09.


__________________________________________________



10.














Notes:

Better early than late!

Secrets Left to Post: 02 pages, 034 secrets from Secret Submission Post #423.
Secrets Not Posted: [ 0 - broken links ], [ 0 - not!secrets ], [ 0 - not!fandom ], [ 0 - too big ], [ 0 - repeat ].
Current Secret Submissions Post: here.
Suggestions, comments, and concerns should go here.

(Anonymous) 2015-02-11 03:50 am (UTC)(link)
Shall I get out my tiny imaginary violin, you bitter, bitter child?

Omg someone knows something better than you do and will argue those points with you when you make blatant mistakes, clearly they're horrible and undeserving!

(Anonymous) 2015-02-11 03:53 am (UTC)(link)
It has nothing to do with arguing points and everything to do with the notion that you deserve any kind of respect simply for having created something. No one does.

(Anonymous) 2015-02-11 04:02 am (UTC)(link)
So no one deserves basic human decency in your world.

No wonder you're bitter.

(Anonymous) 2015-02-11 04:03 am (UTC)(link)
It's not a bad idea to be decent, but no one's entitled to decency, no.

(Anonymous) 2015-02-11 04:54 am (UTC)(link)
But people are entitled to copy and redistribute media?

(Anonymous) 2015-02-11 05:02 am (UTC)(link)
See, this is what I'm talking about when I'm talking about twisting words. You're taking "if someone has a copy of something that's no longer being distributed, they should be allowed to keep it" and turning it into "if someone has a copy of something, then they should be able to redistribute it." Which is not what I've said. At all.