case: (Default)
Case ([personal profile] case) wrote in [community profile] fandomsecrets2015-02-11 05:58 pm

[ SECRET POST #2961 ]


⌈ Secret Post #2961 ⌋

Warning: Some secrets are NOT worksafe and may contain SPOILERS.

01.


__________________________________________________



02.
[Alexander Siddig/Star Trek; Deep Space 9/Vertical Limit/Poirot/24]


__________________________________________________



03.


__________________________________________________



04.


__________________________________________________



05.
[Transformers: Fall of Cybertron]


__________________________________________________



06.


__________________________________________________



07.


__________________________________________________



08.


__________________________________________________



09.
[Nightwish]


__________________________________________________



10.













Notes:

Better early than late!

Secrets Left to Post: 02 pages, 024 secrets from Secret Submission Post #423.
Secrets Not Posted: [ 0 - broken links ], [ 0 - not!secrets ], [ 0 - not!fandom ], [ 0 - too big ], [ 0 - repeat ].
Current Secret Submissions Post: here.
Suggestions, comments, and concerns should go here.

(Anonymous) 2015-02-12 12:06 am (UTC)(link)
na

No, but experience of a thing definitely does benefit writing about it sometimes. It's as true of sex acts as it is of anything else.

(Anonymous) 2015-02-12 01:01 am (UTC)(link)
No one's disputing that. What's being disputed is that the only way to research something is to do it.

(Anonymous) 2015-02-12 01:05 am (UTC)(link)
You're wrong. Read again.

What was being disputed was why someone would lie if they HAD done the research.

(Anonymous) 2015-02-12 01:14 am (UTC)(link)
Research in this case specifically meaning "having anal sex."

The thread was about people having anal sex and then lying about it. Anon then said, "they'd rather pretend they're writing something they know nothing about then admit they did the research?" What on earth do you think that implies, if not "the only way to do research is to have anal sex, and if you don't have anal sex, you don't know anything about it?"
diet_poison: (Default)

[personal profile] diet_poison 2015-02-12 05:37 am (UTC)(link)
I think you're reading way too much into that.

You and I both know what anon meant. If I Google something, I did the research on it. Doesn't mean I can't also "do the research" by looking that same thing up in a physical encyclopedia.

(Anonymous) 2015-02-12 02:16 pm (UTC)(link)
Context is important. And the context of the thread isn't googling things, it's having anal sex and then lying about it.
diet_poison: (Default)

[personal profile] diet_poison 2015-02-12 06:24 pm (UTC)(link)
mhm. And nowhere does that imply that having anal sex is the only way to research writing about anal sex. Nowhere.