case: (Default)
Case ([personal profile] case) wrote in [community profile] fandomsecrets2015-02-11 05:58 pm

[ SECRET POST #2961 ]


⌈ Secret Post #2961 ⌋

Warning: Some secrets are NOT worksafe and may contain SPOILERS.

01.


__________________________________________________



02.
[Alexander Siddig/Star Trek; Deep Space 9/Vertical Limit/Poirot/24]


__________________________________________________



03.


__________________________________________________



04.


__________________________________________________



05.
[Transformers: Fall of Cybertron]


__________________________________________________



06.


__________________________________________________



07.


__________________________________________________



08.


__________________________________________________



09.
[Nightwish]


__________________________________________________



10.













Notes:

Better early than late!

Secrets Left to Post: 02 pages, 024 secrets from Secret Submission Post #423.
Secrets Not Posted: [ 0 - broken links ], [ 0 - not!secrets ], [ 0 - not!fandom ], [ 0 - too big ], [ 0 - repeat ].
Current Secret Submissions Post: here.
Suggestions, comments, and concerns should go here.

(Anonymous) 2015-02-12 12:51 am (UTC)(link)
But that's true of everything. Research is important, but "research" doesn't have to mean "actually doing the thing."

(Anonymous) 2015-02-12 01:02 am (UTC)(link)
Sure, but some writers do try things out just for the sake of the experience. I've tried traveling to places, eating new foods, trying my hands with crafts and tools, watching sports or listening to different kinds of music and all sorts of things I wasn't interested in until I got the urge to write about them. I once went to Catholic Mass a couple of times just because I was writing a character who was Catholic.

A common, normal, harmless sex act is something a writer might plausibly choose to experiment with for authenticity. Murder isn't. That's why the comparison is bizarre.

(Anonymous) 2015-02-12 01:05 am (UTC)(link)
But this isn't about whether people should or shouldn't, or can or can't, try something if they feel doing so will help them write about it. This is about people being able to write convincingly about things they haven't done.

(Anonymous) 2015-02-12 01:16 am (UTC)(link)
Well, of course people can write convincingly about things they haven't done. People can also write very unconvincingly about things they actually have done too! It's really down to the skill of the writer either way. Part of that skill is the ability to convey evocative sensual details that make the actions seem really concrete, and research in all its forms can help that. But really good writers can also totally make it up from scratch. It's a matter of chops, really.