case: (Default)
Case ([personal profile] case) wrote in [community profile] fandomsecrets2015-02-12 06:38 pm

[ SECRET POST #2962 ]


⌈ Secret Post #2962 ⌋

Warning: Some secrets are NOT worksafe and may contain SPOILERS.

01.


__________________________________________________



02.
[Final Fantasy IX]


__________________________________________________



03.
[Gaia Online]


__________________________________________________



04.
(Guardians of the Galaxy)


__________________________________________________



05.
[Batman: Arkham City]


__________________________________________________



06.
(Ming Na Wen)


__________________________________________________



07.
[Terry Pratchett]


__________________________________________________



08.
[The Fall]


__________________________________________________



09.
[Markiplier's Youtube Let's Plays]


__________________________________________________



10.
(Karen Gillan in Guardians of the Galaxy)













Notes:

Secrets Left to Post: 01 pages, 014 secrets from Secret Submission Post #422.
Secrets Not Posted: [ 0 - broken links ], [ 0 - not!secrets ], [ 0 - not!fandom ], [ 0 - too big ], [ 0 - repeat ].
Current Secret Submissions Post: here.
Suggestions, comments, and concerns should go here.

(Anonymous) 2015-02-13 03:59 am (UTC)(link)
(na)
This "what you like* is problematic and you have to self-flagellate constantly about how problematic it is" movement is one of the things I really hate about fandom right now.

Maybe you can try stop assuming the worse about the people watching stuff like this?

*Or produce, in this case. Though I'm talking about the movie and only the people involved with the movie, not about E.L.
diet_poison: (Default)

[personal profile] diet_poison 2015-02-13 08:19 am (UTC)(link)
I like how anon's complaints about marketing KEEP being interpreted as complaints about the material itself.

Man, so many people missing the point, so hard.

[personal profile] anonymous4 2015-02-14 02:09 am (UTC)(link)
I've been thinking about this all day, and I'm late but I'm going to reply anyway...

This rant isn't directed at you, just sparked by what you said.

Yes, anon is complaining about the marketing, but what she seems to be saying is that marketing 50 Shades of Crap as a romance will make people see it as a romance. No. It may lure them in under false pretences, but how many times have you -- and I -- been misled by a film trailer? And were we then unable to see the film for what it was?

Some people will love it, yes, but -- assuming it is actually as bad as everyone seems to expect -- there are idiots in every bunch (and some of the people who do love it will love selective things about it, and not swallow it whole).

A person's engagement with a story is complex. People are not bound to come away from something 'problematic' like 50 Shades corrupted. They can come away having vicariously experienced corruption and having worked out for themselves that it's a bad thing.





diet_poison: (Default)

[personal profile] diet_poison 2015-02-14 07:27 am (UTC)(link)
I don't think people will watch 50SoG and be immediately corrupted by forces of...whatever...like robots.

It wouldn't even be an issue except some people have come away from it with a negative message. Even a slight change in attitude builds up when it affects a lot of people. My biggest issue is the way it's marketed as What Women Really Want and how some men are buying into that. It's what Some Women Really Want (To Fantasize About) and I wish it were treated as such.

[personal profile] anonymous4 2015-02-14 01:33 pm (UTC)(link)
But we've no way of know how many people (men) went into it thinking they were going to see What Women Want and came out asking 'Is that what you want?'...

ETA Those slight changes build up as well.
Edited 2015-02-14 13:34 (UTC)
diet_poison: (Default)

[personal profile] diet_poison 2015-02-14 04:52 pm (UTC)(link)
More mature men are more likely to ask that question. I don't feel that confident in all of them, though.

Marketing is a very big force in pop culture and a lot of people seem to act like it's nothing. Honestly, that stuff seeps into our brains and affects us in ways we don't realize. There's a reason companies spend millions and millions of dollars on ads - there are psychological studies backing up the fact that they work and they use psychological tricks to increase their effectiveness. Marketing plays a big factor here too. I keep hearing on the radio "ladies, this is for you - I know you're getting excited about 50SoG!" and I cringe every time...there are already soooo many stereotypes out there about What Women Want (and also What Men Want, if we're honest) as well as plenty of guys (and some women) who are convinced they know What All Women Really Want and even go so far as to say women themselves don't know as well as they do (I've seen it several times myself) and it's fucking creepy.

Again, people can have their ravishment fantasies. They are reeeeally not my cuppa, but I'm sure some of the stuff that turns me on leaves other people cold too, so whatev. But if we're going to market abuse as romance and romanticized abuse as women's collective ideal romance and pour tons of money into selling that stuff that way, I'm going to have a problem with it because it will have a cultural impact.

And maybe I'm just being cynical but I honestly think you're giving people a lot of credit to assume that everyone or even most people who go to see that movie (or any movie, or any media at all) will be going in with a mindset of critical analysis. People don't really consume media that way. Many people here do because we're all nerds and we're in a place designed for us to get together and talk about this shit and we all came here for a reason. Most people don't care that much and don't really consciously think about a lot of what they consume. This isn't to say they're unintelligent, just that they take a different approach to media. We are not the target fanbase for most of the stuff talked about on this forum. The target fanbase is basically casual viewers.
Edited 2015-02-14 16:55 (UTC)

[personal profile] anonymous4 2015-02-15 03:02 pm (UTC)(link)
I earned my living in advertising for years, both as an account manager and as a copy writer, so I do know a fair bit about advertising and social engineering, and I'm both fascinated by and disgusted by it... But I also know how often it misfires. Because advertising is only one of many -- competing, conflicting, complementary -- influences shaping culture.

I don't know if it's because I'm older or because I'm English and, therefore, from what I'm realising is a very different culture (divided by a common language, as they say), but, yes, I do have a more sanguine view of people than most members of F!S seem to have, and I can't see anything ever changing that. My family members do not have the training in media analysis that we have, and I can confirm that they consume TV and film critically. Newspapers, I find, they tend to believe; TV news, they question.

But people's reaction to 50Shades doesn't have to be analytical (in fact, I'm beginning to think that too much emphasis on meta has broken fandom's ability to consume stories as stories => fandom wank and bullshit, but that's another argument). All people have to do with 50Shades is laugh. Or think, "What a tosser!" Or, "Ewwwww!" Or, "My girlfriend would have my balls for that..."
diet_poison: (Default)

[personal profile] diet_poison 2015-02-15 07:18 pm (UTC)(link)
Ok, fair enough. You certainly know more about advertising than I do if you've worked in it :)

But the 50SoG phenomenon still creeps me out and I hate that it's being portrayed as women's ultimate dream for romance. Whether or not it has a cultural effect (and I think it will), that still just makes me really mad, by itself.

And yeah, your family might consume media in a certain way, but everyone is different and many people blindly accept things they see on TV news and so forth. Sadly.