[ SECRET POST #2967 ]

[case]

⌈ Secret Post #2967 ⌋

Warning: Some secrets are NOT worksafe and may contain SPOILERS.

01.


__________________________________________________



02.


__________________________________________________



03.


__________________________________________________



04.


__________________________________________________



05.


__________________________________________________



06.


__________________________________________________



07.


__________________________________________________



08.


__________________________________________________



09.


__________________________________________________



10.














Notes:

Secrets Left to Post: 02 pages, 034 secrets from Secret Submission Post #424.
Secrets Not Posted: [ 0 - broken links ], [ 1 - not!secrets (also too big anyway) ], [ 0 - not!fandom ], [ 0 - too big ], [ 0 - repeat ].
Current Secret Submissions Post: here.
Suggestions, comments, and concerns should go here.

Comments

[(Anonymous)]

I agree, the thing a lot of people don't seem to get is that there has been a LONG history of movies portraying male stalker/abuser behavior as romantic, and female stalker behavior as nuts. So people will yell that 50 Shades of Gray is "just porn" and anyone who condemns it thinks women can't tell the difference between reality and fantasy, but the thing is, it's marketed as a movie. Not porn, just a movie. So of course people are going to see it as just one more movie in a long line of movies that romanticize stalkery behavior in men.

People would probably also be more okay with it, if the same thing with the genders switched existed, so that it didn't seem so much like society thinks dominant, abusive man = romantic, while you can't even have a dominant woman who isn't even abusive (and the abusive ones aren't portrayed as romantic).