[ SECRET POST #2974 ]

[case]

⌈ Secret Post #2974 ⌋

Warning: Some secrets are NOT worksafe and may contain SPOILERS.

01.


__________________________________________________



02.


__________________________________________________



03.


__________________________________________________



04.


__________________________________________________



05.


__________________________________________________



06.


__________________________________________________



07.


__________________________________________________



08.


__________________________________________________



09.


__________________________________________________



10.


__________________________________________________



11.


__________________________________________________



12.


__________________________________________________



13.


__________________________________________________



14.









Notes:

Secrets Left to Post: 02 pages, 044 secrets from Secret Submission Post #425.
Secrets Not Posted: [ 0 - broken links ], [ 0 - not!secrets ], [ 0 - not!fandom ], [ 0 - too big ], [ 0 - repeat ].
Current Secret Submissions Post: here.
Suggestions, comments, and concerns should go here.

Comments

[(Anonymous)]

Moffat can't win. He made one of the two main (as in repeatedly regenerated Time Lords) female and it's gripe gripe gripe. He didn't cast a female as the Doctor and it's bitch bitch bitch. It is now canon (and not just a one off comment) that time lords can regenerate to a different gender if they choose to. That opens entire vistas of potential. You'd think people would be grateful, but you'd be wrong.

Get over yourselves, you whiners.

[(Anonymous)]

No, I think that's a good thing, I just also think the episode it's in is shitty.

Which, surely, is not an unreasonable point to make? Like, say The Twin Dilemma was exactly the same except it contained unambiguous canonical confirmation that Time Lords could change gender when they regenerate. It would still be a fucking awful episode, right?

I like that Moffat did the one thing, I just don't like many of the other things he did. This is not a difficult position to understand. And I don't think liking the one thing means that I'm somehow obligated to stop criticizing him for the other things. It's like in your mind there's some kind of bizarre contractual relationship between a writer and his fans, where as long as he throws us a bone every once in a while, we're somehow obligated to keep quiet and like what he does. But that's not the way it works. My opinion of Steven Moffat is not the sum of some internal arithmetic I do regarding where he's moving Doctor Who, it's an evaluation of whether or not he's writing good episodes of TV, and I don't think he is.

[othellia]

I am grateful for that.

But I can also gripe all I want about gender vs sex vs all of Moffat's female villains acting and looking exactly the same.

Just because Moffat wrote the Master as a woman does not mean that he was HAD to characterize her the way he ultimately did.

[(Anonymous)]

You know you can like something and still think critical of it, right? And that you don't have to accept terrible rotten table scraps?