case: (Default)
Case ([personal profile] case) wrote in [community profile] fandomsecrets2015-03-06 07:04 pm

[ SECRET POST #2984 ]


⌈ Secret Post #2984 ⌋

Warning: Some secrets are NOT worksafe and may contain SPOILERS.

01.


__________________________________________________



02. [repeat]


__________________________________________________



03.


__________________________________________________



04.


__________________________________________________



05.


__________________________________________________



06.


__________________________________________________



07.


__________________________________________________



08.


__________________________________________________



09.


__________________________________________________



10.


__________________________________________________



11.


__________________________________________________



12.


__________________________________________________



13.


__________________________________________________



14.


__________________________________________________



15. [repeat]


__________________________________________________



16.


__________________________________________________



17.


__________________________________________________



18. [ SPOILERS for Pitch Black]



__________________________________________________



19. [ SPOILERS for Confessions of an Ugly Stepsister ]



__________________________________________________



20. [ WARNING for incest ]



__________________________________________________



21. [ WARNING for rape ]
















Notes:

Secrets Left to Post: 00 pages, 000 secrets from Secret Submission Post #426.
Secrets Not Posted: [ 0 - broken links ], [ 0 - not!secrets ], [ 0 - not!fandom ], [ 1 - too big ], [ 0 - repeat ].
Current Secret Submissions Post: here.
Suggestions, comments, and concerns should go here.

(Anonymous) 2015-03-07 01:23 am (UTC)(link)
Should they not have changed their stance on sterilization? What about "imbalance of the humours?" Should that still be a diagnosis? How about hysteria? Should we still declare women ill for having high sex drives and attempt to treat them through measures up to an including hysterectomy? Should we still treat breast cancer the way we used to, by not only removing the breasts but also ribs, portions of the sternum, portions of one or both shoulders, etc, disfiguring women and making it so many of them have to live as invalids, even though it didn't actually stop the cancer from returning?

I'm sure it must be very frustrating to you, but the medical profession "pulls this kind of thing" because they LEARN and try to IMPROVE. But, hey, if you don't like that, next time you get sick, try blood-letting. After all, that used to be considered a perfectly acceptable treatment, and it sure is stupid that they changed it.

(Anonymous) 2015-03-07 01:38 am (UTC)(link)
It's kind of silly that you're bringing up blood-letting and gratuitous hysterectomies in a discussion about simply renaming/reclassifying a disorder. =S

(Anonymous) 2015-03-07 02:03 am (UTC)(link)
Treatments for disorders that have since been either reclassified or done away with are relevant to a discussion of the renaming/reclassification of a disorder, because renaming/reclassification changes or leads to different treatment.