Case (
case) wrote in
fandomsecrets2015-03-09 06:54 pm
[ SECRET POST #2987 ]
⌈ Secret Post #2987 ⌋
Warning: Some secrets are NOT worksafe and may contain SPOILERS.
01.

__________________________________________________
02.

__________________________________________________
03.

__________________________________________________
04.

__________________________________________________
05.

__________________________________________________
06.

__________________________________________________
07.

__________________________________________________
08.

__________________________________________________
09.

__________________________________________________
10.

__________________________________________________
11.

__________________________________________________
12.

__________________________________________________
13.

__________________________________________________
14.

__________________________________________________
15.

__________________________________________________
16.

__________________________________________________
17.

Notes:
Secrets Left to Post: 03 pages, 068 secrets from Secret Submission Post #427.
Secrets Not Posted: [ 0 - broken links ], [ 0 - not!secrets ], [ 1 - not!fandom ], [ 0 - too big ], [ 1 - repeat ].
Current Secret Submissions Post: here.
Suggestions, comments, and concerns should go here.

no subject
(Anonymous) 2015-03-09 11:26 pm (UTC)(link)More important is how are they drawing them? What sort of subject material is it? Why do they draw what they do? The first response points out a valid argument: if respect or unsexism is solely based on how many characters of the gender you draw, are straight male artists who only draw female characters super feminist? Hardly!
no subject
(Anonymous) 2015-03-09 11:56 pm (UTC)(link)I'm allowed to feel and think whatever I want about other people's art and this community's reaction sure makes it seem like I'm some fascist boogieman who's planning to destroy all their SPN smut or whatever.
no subject
(Anonymous) 2015-03-10 12:00 am (UTC)(link)What an weird response. You're allowed to say whatever you want, but others are not allowed to think what they want of it or disagree? That's not how it works
no subject
(Anonymous) 2015-03-10 12:10 am (UTC)(link)no subject
(Anonymous) 2015-03-10 12:13 am (UTC)(link)no subject
(Anonymous) 2015-03-10 12:27 am (UTC)(link)Is anybody mocking and insulting you? I think people are disagreeing with your statement and maybe mocking the ideas you have, but that is hardly mocking and insulting you. I hope you don't equate your opinions with your identity. We don't even know who you are.
no subject
(Anonymous) 2015-03-10 12:19 am (UTC)(link)I disagree with OP and I think you're a complete idiot.
no subject
(Anonymous) 2015-03-10 12:24 am (UTC)(link)If you want to think I'm a complete idiot because of that single thing, though... okay?
no subject
(Anonymous) 2015-03-10 12:30 am (UTC)(link)Don't worry, anon. That anon above you is obviously using some sort of complete idiot logic. "I disagree with you; therefore = complete idiot."
And all of us complete idiots and anons are indistinguishable from each other, which makes the name-calling that much more silly.
no subject
(Anonymous) 2015-03-10 12:05 am (UTC)(link)no subject
(Anonymous) 2015-03-10 12:06 am (UTC)(link)no subject
(Anonymous) 2015-03-10 01:21 am (UTC)(link)Okay then.
aw yeah??
(Anonymous) 2015-03-10 05:10 am (UTC)(link)Sparkledogs.
The more eye-searing the color combinations, the better.
Get to it, or you die under my sparkly, iron-clad rule, artists!