case: (Default)
Case ([personal profile] case) wrote in [community profile] fandomsecrets2015-03-14 03:39 pm

[ SECRET POST #2992 ]


⌈ Secret Post #2992 ⌋

Warning: Some secrets are NOT worksafe and may contain SPOILERS.

01.


__________________________________________________



02.
[Grand Theft Auto 5]


__________________________________________________



03.
[Zipang]


__________________________________________________



04.
[Ricky Gervais]


__________________________________________________



05.
[Tokyo Babylon/X1999]


__________________________________________________



06.
[Dexter]


__________________________________________________



07.
[The Mentalist]


__________________________________________________



08.
[The Truth - Terry Pratchett]


__________________________________________________



09.
[It's Always Sunny in Philadelphia]


__________________________________________________



10.
[Douglas Adams]


__________________________________________________



11.
[Black Books]


__________________________________________________



12.
[Lucky Star]


__________________________________________________



13.
[Edward Petherbridge as Lord Peter Wimsey]


__________________________________________________



14.
[Ga-In, Brown Eyed Girls]


__________________________________________________



15.
[Oz the Great and Powerful]


__________________________________________________



16.
[Colin Baker]


__________________________________________________



17.
[9 Hours, 9 Persons, 9 Doors]


__________________________________________________



18.
[Yatterman Night]


__________________________________________________



19.
[Johnny the Homicidal Maniac]


__________________________________________________



20.
[Blake's 7]


__________________________________________________



21.
[Game Grumps]


__________________________________________________



22.
[Alexis Denisof]







Notes:

Secrets Left to Post: 07 pages, 170 secrets from Secret Submission Post #428.
Secrets Not Posted: [ 0 - broken links ], [ 0 - not!secrets ], [ 0 - not!fandom ], [ 0 - too big ], [ 0 - repeat ].
Current Secret Submissions Post: here.
Suggestions, comments, and concerns should go here.

Re: Moral dilemmas

(Anonymous) 2015-03-14 08:24 pm (UTC)(link)
I find the concept of grave-robbing/tomb desecration silly to be honest. Unless they have living relatives or someone with a claim to to the legacy, who CARES?

They're DEAD. It's not like the person who is dead is gonna care.
ibbity: (Default)

Re: Moral dilemmas

[personal profile] ibbity 2015-03-14 08:29 pm (UTC)(link)
They were still a person, carefully buried by people who cared about them in a way that fit with their beliefs and culture. Most archaeologists also seem to struggle with this from time to time, it's not like it's completely out there to worry about disrespecting what they intended. I mean, there are plenty of people found dead in the modern day who don't have any family or anything, would that make it ok to just throw their bodies in a landfill and not care?

Re: Moral dilemmas

(Anonymous) 2015-03-14 08:42 pm (UTC)(link)
Speaking for myself -- I don't give a shit. And anyone who is dead is clearly incapable of caring. The reason to care, as far as I'm concerned, is not to cause emotional distress to loved ones or descendants.

And you should never be intentionally disrespectful/desecrate in a hateful manner.

But, say, you're running out of room to bury the dead and there's a bunch of unmarked graves that no one cares about? Go ahead and dig them up and put them in a much smaller communal grave. I don't think that's an issue at all.
supermanda: (Default)

Re: Moral dilemmas

[personal profile] supermanda 2015-03-14 10:27 pm (UTC)(link)
I totally agree with this, all of it.

But I don't blame anyone who doesn't. Stuff like this makes us human!:
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=I07xDdFMdgw
Edited 2015-03-14 22:29 (UTC)

Re: Moral dilemmas

(Anonymous) 2015-03-14 08:37 pm (UTC)(link)
In Bio/Forensic Anthropology and Archaeology, we're (supposed to be) taught to handle human remains with care because they were once real, living humans and we are in the field of humans.

Re: Moral dilemmas

(Anonymous) 2015-03-14 08:39 pm (UTC)(link)
Well sure, there's no reason to be INTENTIONALLY disrespectful. But if you accidentally break some of the bones, there's no reason to get all up in arms about it. They're DEAD. If you didn't mean to do it, took all feasible precautions, and something still went wrong, then no biggie as far as I'm concerned.

Re: Moral dilemmas

(Anonymous) 2015-03-14 08:41 pm (UTC)(link)
...some religions believe bodies must be buried whole (i.e. no cremation/autopsies/etc) and it's very important the bones not be disturbed.

Plus, the terrible things that always happened to Indiana Jones.

Re: Moral dilemmas

(Anonymous) 2015-03-14 08:43 pm (UTC)(link)
Yeah, but once those family members are dead, who cares?

The person who is dead won't care. (They're dead). And if all of the loved ones are gone then no one's feelings will be hurt. No one will be left to be upset. So if there's no one left who will care, it's a non-issue.

So go to town.

Re: Moral dilemmas

(Anonymous) 2015-03-14 08:58 pm (UTC)(link)
0/10 you blew it by responding to every reply. You on Flat View or smth?

Re: Moral dilemmas

(Anonymous) 2015-03-14 09:02 pm (UTC)(link)
What's Flat View? And why wouldn't I respond to every reply?

I legitimately don't think that digging up the graves of people with no loved ones/descendants is an issue. Unless it's to be intentionally disrespectful -- such as if it was done on the basis of ethnic/racial hatred. Because then the members of that ethnic/racial group would be upset.

But digging up the graves of people long gone, with no living loved ones, and with no descendants or community to get upset by it is a completely moral non-issue to me.
dethtoll: (Default)

Re: Moral dilemmas

[personal profile] dethtoll 2015-03-14 09:12 pm (UTC)(link)
NGL this is kind of a silly troll accusation. That's like someone who refused to debate with me because I had 10 years on my Steam account and that meant I was a better troll than him. It's like, what?

Re: Moral dilemmas

(Anonymous) 2015-03-14 09:23 pm (UTC)(link)
ayrt

Eh, something about it just pinged my trolldar. Think it was the repetitive insistence on standing their ground, in the replies. I could be wrong. *shrug*
dethtoll: (Default)

Re: Moral dilemmas

[personal profile] dethtoll 2015-03-14 09:24 pm (UTC)(link)
idk some people just firmly believe in stuff and the opinion in question isn't THAT out-there IMO. Unlike, say, that person who kept bringing up how much they hated waitresses.

Re: Moral dilemmas

(Anonymous) 2015-03-14 09:29 pm (UTC)(link)
DA

Is it so hard to believe someone could hold that viewpoint, and not be trolling? I mean, personally I agree with them. Once someone is dead, that's it, and even if you decide to dig them up and put them in a museum, they're not going to suffer from it.

Re: Moral dilemmas

(Anonymous) 2015-03-15 04:00 am (UTC)(link)
You are saying their beliefs don't matter whatsoever. Which is, as a number of those religions and cultural strictures are still practiced to this day, essentially saying that the beliefs of the thousands of still-living people who practice them don't matter. That's a lot of feelings to hurt, and a lot of people who will care. Anything with cultural or religious implications has a much, much wider impact than just the people immediately affected by it.