[ SECRET POST #3003 ]

[case]

⌈ Secret Post #3003 ⌋

Warning: Some secrets are NOT worksafe and may contain SPOILERS.

01.


__________________________________________________



02.


__________________________________________________



03.


__________________________________________________



04.


__________________________________________________



05.


__________________________________________________



06.


__________________________________________________



07.


__________________________________________________



08.


__________________________________________________



09.


__________________________________________________



10.


__________________________________________________



11.


__________________________________________________



12.


__________________________________________________



13.


__________________________________________________



14.


__________________________________________________



15.


__________________________________________________



16.


__________________________________________________



17.


__________________________________________________



18.


__________________________________________________



19.


__________________________________________________



20.










Notes:

Secrets Left to Post: 02 pages, 043 secrets from Secret Submission Post #429.
Secrets Not Posted: [ 0 - broken links ], [ 0 - not!secrets ], [ 0 - not!fandom ], [ 0 - too big ], [ 0 - repeat ].
Current Secret Submissions Post: here.
Suggestions, comments, and concerns should go here.

Comments

[fscom]

14. http://i.imgur.com/5ZYpKHN.jpg

[comradesmiler]

If he takes off DG will he die?

[(Anonymous)]

I think he'll possibly revert to his original state of an nonuniform mass.

[comradesmiler]

He's a big guy.

[(Anonymous)]

For you.

[(Anonymous)]

Agreed. I hope no one associates with them ever again. We should all treat them as unpeople, because of their beliefs

[feotakahari]

When someone says you're not a person, why not respond in kind?

[(Anonymous)]

Like

Do I really have to answer why it's bad to respond to someone doing stupid and hurtful by bring stupid and hurtful in the exact same way

[feotakahari]

This isn't an issue of doing something. This is an issue of not doing something, not getting involved. To be clear, I don't believe in any moral obligation against buying their clothing, unless they're donating money to some horrible cause, and I think it's ridiculous to taint folks by association, but if you choose to not involve yourself with them, that's your decision.

[(Anonymous)]

FIGHT THE POWER

REPLACE IT WITH IDENTICAL POWER

I looked up the context

[feotakahari]

They're gay Christians, and they're against "non-traditional families," by which they apparently mean in-vitro fertilization. The irony is killing me, especially since the Christian Post suddenly loves them.

Re: I looked up the context

[(Anonymous)]

I just... wow. I never knew the actual context before, just the "non-traditional family thing".

Re: I looked up the context

[feotakahari]

They're against "synthetic children," whatever that means.

Re: I looked up the context

[(Anonymous)]

oh come on. There's plenty wrong with their stance but pinning the whole thing on the possible implications of a word that has a history of careless colloquialization is just ridiculous.
I still believe that the word "Heteronormative" is bullshit, but I don't go snorting through every class of gender studies whispering to my neighbor how "they just said that our society is 'differently normed', lol!", because it's lexicalized bullshit, and that's hwo language works.

Re: I looked up the context

[(Anonymous)]

I need some more context - are they against all IVF, or against 3-parent IVF?

Re: I looked up the context

[diet_poison]

Are they against it for themselves/choosing to not partake for moral reasons and being outspoken about it, or are they trying to get it banned or something?

Re: I looked up the context

[(Anonymous)]

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dolce_%26_Gabbana#Gay_Adoption_Controversy

Re: I looked up the context

[glo_unit]

Which is odd because one of them wanted a child by in-vitro.

http://www.dailymail.co.uk/femail/article-421672/Gay-designer-Gabbana-sex-parents.html

Re: I looked up the context

[(Anonymous)]

I find it hard to get really angry at them - their statements seem a lot like self-loathing more than anything. I kind of pity whatever they're feeling to get them to this point. It somehow doesn't strike me as a "let's protest them constantly" kind of thing for some reason, in the way that it would if they were straight people saying this. Idk.

[(Anonymous)]

Why Nolan in particular?

[(Anonymous)]

IKR???

[(Anonymous)]

Because he's a big fandom name I guess? I haven't been into Nolanverse in forever, though.

[(Anonymous)]

Does he use D&G in some way, endorse them somehow? Or should all famous people disclaim everyone who ever says anything crap?

Bizarre.

Transcript

[(Anonymous)]

Image: Christopher Nolan holding a video camera [I think]

Text: I want nothing more to do with this fandom until Christopher Nolan publically disassociates himself from Dolce Gabanna

[(Anonymous)]

Seriously, how can people just not let two old gay dudes be old gay dudes of a different generation and a different culture, at that. It's not like they said that their opinion was the only rigt thing to believe. It was just a fucking personal opinion. I hate this fucking attitude of "I won't buy at your store if you don't share my exact beliefs".