case: (Default)
Case ([personal profile] case) wrote in [community profile] fandomsecrets2015-03-25 06:48 pm

[ SECRET POST #3003 ]


⌈ Secret Post #3003 ⌋

Warning: Some secrets are NOT worksafe and may contain SPOILERS.

01.


__________________________________________________



02.


__________________________________________________



03.


__________________________________________________



04.


__________________________________________________



05.


__________________________________________________



06.


__________________________________________________



07.


__________________________________________________



08.


__________________________________________________



09.


__________________________________________________



10.


__________________________________________________



11.


__________________________________________________



12.


__________________________________________________



13.


__________________________________________________



14.


__________________________________________________



15.


__________________________________________________



16.


__________________________________________________



17.


__________________________________________________



18.


__________________________________________________



19.


__________________________________________________



20.










Notes:

Secrets Left to Post: 02 pages, 043 secrets from Secret Submission Post #429.
Secrets Not Posted: [ 0 - broken links ], [ 0 - not!secrets ], [ 0 - not!fandom ], [ 0 - too big ], [ 0 - repeat ].
Current Secret Submissions Post: here.
Suggestions, comments, and concerns should go here.

(Anonymous) 2015-03-26 12:14 pm (UTC)(link)
No it waters down the concept of self-censorship to something essentially useless.

Which is is. I'm just using the concept of self censorship to show that censorship is NOT exclusive to government intervention.

Almost everyone can self-censor it's not special or dangerous or a violation of free speech. Free speech depends on people censoring themselves.

I'm just using it to show that Censor = To suppress expression. In the context of self censorship is is not bad.

Look (and I agree this doesn't entirely fit because self-harm is still not good, but it will work to show that a word still applies even when the context decreases the meaning) "Harm" is a bad thing. If I cut myself it is self-harm
If someone else cuts me it is just plain harm. Someone else cutting me is a crime. Me cutting myself is a decision I made. The existence of the concept of self harm does not water down thee concept of harm. Not an ideal fit, but you see where I'm coming from, yes?
diet_poison: (Default)

[personal profile] diet_poison 2015-03-27 05:34 am (UTC)(link)
If the concept of self-censorship is essentially useless, why are people so ardently trying to make it part of the useful/functional definition of "censorship"?