[ SECRET POST #3003 ]

[case]

⌈ Secret Post #3003 ⌋

Warning: Some secrets are NOT worksafe and may contain SPOILERS.

01.


__________________________________________________



02.


__________________________________________________



03.


__________________________________________________



04.


__________________________________________________



05.


__________________________________________________



06.


__________________________________________________



07.


__________________________________________________



08.


__________________________________________________



09.


__________________________________________________



10.


__________________________________________________



11.


__________________________________________________



12.


__________________________________________________



13.


__________________________________________________



14.


__________________________________________________



15.


__________________________________________________



16.


__________________________________________________



17.


__________________________________________________



18.


__________________________________________________



19.


__________________________________________________



20.










Notes:

Secrets Left to Post: 02 pages, 043 secrets from Secret Submission Post #429.
Secrets Not Posted: [ 0 - broken links ], [ 0 - not!secrets ], [ 0 - not!fandom ], [ 0 - too big ], [ 0 - repeat ].
Current Secret Submissions Post: here.
Suggestions, comments, and concerns should go here.

Comments

[cbrachyrhynchos]

I think if I were to point out that that considering terrorists an institution could spawn the same argument over definitions we are already having over the definition of censorship, you might get what I am saying?

What you don't seem to understand is that I get what you're saying. It's still wrong. It doesn't matter how much you try to shine that turd, separating institutional power from censorship so that you can yell "censorship" indiscriminately in ways that confuse it with criticism and comment is wrong.

If we're going to talk about terrorism as censorship, we need to talk about terrorism as part of heavily funded and organized ideological movements. If we're going to talk about harassment as censorship, we need to talk about levels of power and privilege and abuse of power that allows that to happen.