case: (Default)
Case ([personal profile] case) wrote in [community profile] fandomsecrets2015-04-04 03:17 pm

[ SECRET POST #3013 ]


⌈ Secret Post #3013 ⌋

Warning: Some secrets are NOT worksafe and may contain SPOILERS.

01.


__________________________________________________



02.


__________________________________________________



03.


__________________________________________________



04.


__________________________________________________



05.


__________________________________________________



06.


__________________________________________________



07.


__________________________________________________



08.


__________________________________________________



09.


__________________________________________________



10.


__________________________________________________



11.


__________________________________________________



12.


__________________________________________________



13.


__________________________________________________



14.


__________________________________________________



15.


__________________________________________________



16.


__________________________________________________



17.


__________________________________________________



18.


__________________________________________________



19.


__________________________________________________



20.


__________________________________________________



21.


__________________________________________________



22.


__________________________________________________



23.









Notes:

Secrets Left to Post: 07 pages, 155 secrets from Secret Submission Post #431.
Secrets Not Posted: [ 0 - broken links ], [ 0 - not!secrets ], [ 0 - not!fandom ], [ 0 - too big ], [ 1 - repeat ].
Current Secret Submissions Post: here.
Suggestions, comments, and concerns should go here.

Hugo Award Slate and Victory of the "Sad Puppies"

(Anonymous) 2015-04-04 11:22 pm (UTC)(link)
Anyone got any thoughts? Personally I find it dispiriting that a group can so blithely decide to hijack an award, and for reasons of such petty racism and misogyny too.

I can't decide between just not voting this year, and voting "No Award" across the board. It has clearly been devalued by this, no matter what anyone claims.
cenobitic_anchorite: (Default)

Re: Hugo Award Slate and Victory of the "Sad Puppies"

[personal profile] cenobitic_anchorite 2015-04-04 11:59 pm (UTC)(link)
It's depressing. I'm still absorbing some of the nuances of it, but for Vox Day of ALL FRICKIN' PEOPLE to benefit from the vote-rig campaign is really chapping my ass.

Re: Hugo Award Slate and Victory of the "Sad Puppies"

(Anonymous) 2015-04-05 12:22 am (UTC)(link)
Then there is whole anti-intellectual drive of it, of only works which have pop-culture (or at least what the sad puppies consider ought to be pop culture according to their prejudices) success ought to be considered and nothing overly intellectual should be on the slates. Ugh, just so much ugh.

kamino_neko: Tedd from El Goonish Shive. Drawn by Dan Shive, coloured by Kamino Neko. (Default)

Re: Hugo Award Slate and Victory of the "Sad Puppies"

[personal profile] kamino_neko 2015-04-05 08:12 am (UTC)(link)
Anti-intellectualism in Science Fiction literature.

Truly, the world has turned topsy-turvy.

Re: Hugo Award Slate and Victory of the "Sad Puppies"

(Anonymous) 2015-04-05 02:36 pm (UTC)(link)
Yeah. I know. The thing is, most of these "Sad Puppies" don't give a shit about anything other than social control. While in the past that was seen as the enemy of SF, and most SF was about social control being bad and breaking down barriers, the Sad Puppies have seen a world which genuinely is on the way to SF's meritocracy and their merits are not quite what they thought they were. Vox Day, one of the prime movers of the SP movement is quite insistent on the natural superiority of the "white" race. And one of the others engineered a situation where he got his fans to block vote a Hugo nomination just so he could "graciously" turn it down (because you can't be called a loser if you decline the competition). Obviously one is objectively far worse than the other, in the sense they are a true-believer of horridness and the latter is just a piece of self-aggrandizing scum who saw an opportunity, but it is still soul destroying the way they have both engineered a situation where they are getting people to vote for the person with the least vision.

Re: Hugo Award Slate and Victory of the "Sad Puppies"

(Anonymous) 2015-04-05 12:48 am (UTC)(link)

I think the thing which worries me most about this is the deliberate outreach toward a certain set of online wreckers; outreach which was deliberately couched in terms of “this is another way to hurt your enemies, the social justice warriors” rather than any mention of actually supporting anything positive.

I suspect this outreach to be more indicative of their true intentions than anything else they’ve done. By their actions shall ye know them.

Re: Hugo Award Slate and Victory of the "Sad Puppies"

(Anonymous) 2015-04-05 03:33 am (UTC)(link)
Oh, it absolutely shows their true colors. They can claim to be all about enthusiasm for SF and inclusion for some vague group of people they think don't have a voice (i.e. dogwhistle terms for old white guys who lean hard right or at least anyone who isn't female, non-white or liberal), but their campaign to make this about beating the nasty feminists and SJWs makes it clear what they really mean, nudge nudge wink wink.

They do not have a single dry shit about the genre. They just want to score a "win" by lifting up their clique as a whole and their own underwhelming work in particular.

Re: Hugo Award Slate and Victory of the "Sad Puppies"

(Anonymous) 2015-04-05 01:18 am (UTC)(link)
http://voxday.blogspot.jp/2015/04/the-gates-of-hell-shall-not-prevail.html

Holy shit, one of the guys behind this is such a nutjob he is actually pro-Spanish Inquisition.

Re: Hugo Award Slate and Victory of the "Sad Puppies"

(Anonymous) 2015-04-05 02:04 am (UTC)(link)
This is a surprisingly common position among your real far right Internet weirdo nerds (aka neoreactionary dudes)

Re: Hugo Award Slate and Victory of the "Sad Puppies"

(Anonymous) 2015-04-05 06:07 am (UTC)(link)
Neoreactionaries are to politics as Satanists are to religion.

They don't actually believe the shit coming out of their mouths, they're just trying to say the most unpopular thing they can, or did they just BLOW YOUR MIND, DAD?

Re: Hugo Award Slate and Victory of the "Sad Puppies"

(Anonymous) 2015-04-05 03:28 am (UTC)(link)
Maybe I don't understand how Hugo voting works, but can you not simply note for people who aren't on the Sad Puppy wishlist?

Re: Hugo Award Slate and Victory of the "Sad Puppies"

(Anonymous) 2015-04-05 02:28 pm (UTC)(link)
If you are voting on even a single thing (there are a couple of categories that are Sad Puppy-free) then just leaving the rest of your ballot blank is not enough. You have to leave the Sad Puppy nomination off, and also vote "no award". The Hugo awards system basically is a form of run-off ballot, in general it works well but it can produce some squirrelly loopholes that these racist homophobes are actively trying to exploit.