[ SECRET POST #3013 ]

[case]

⌈ Secret Post #3013 ⌋

Warning: Some secrets are NOT worksafe and may contain SPOILERS.

01.


__________________________________________________



02.


__________________________________________________



03.


__________________________________________________



04.


__________________________________________________



05.


__________________________________________________



06.


__________________________________________________



07.


__________________________________________________



08.


__________________________________________________



09.


__________________________________________________



10.


__________________________________________________



11.


__________________________________________________



12.


__________________________________________________



13.


__________________________________________________



14.


__________________________________________________



15.


__________________________________________________



16.


__________________________________________________



17.


__________________________________________________



18.


__________________________________________________



19.


__________________________________________________



20.


__________________________________________________



21.


__________________________________________________



22.


__________________________________________________



23.









Notes:

Secrets Left to Post: 07 pages, 155 secrets from Secret Submission Post #431.
Secrets Not Posted: [ 0 - broken links ], [ 0 - not!secrets ], [ 0 - not!fandom ], [ 0 - too big ], [ 1 - repeat ].
Current Secret Submissions Post: here.
Suggestions, comments, and concerns should go here.

Comments

nayrt

[(Anonymous)]

When historians accept that there was a historical Jesus, what that really means is that there isn't really any evidence either way, and it's not too farfetched that there was a rabbi named Yeshua ben Yosef who pissed off the Romans, and hey, if there's smoke there must be fire, right?

Even if there was a real Yeshua ben Yosef, Rebel Rabbi, they don't think that he was raised from the dead, or that he said most of what the Bible he said.

Re: nayrt

[(Anonymous)]

Somehow I doubt that sums up the hundreds of volumes written by religious scholars on the matter but what've floats your boat

Re: nayrt

[(Anonymous)]

lol at equating religious scholars to historians, but w/e

Re: nayrt

[(Anonymous)]

Both have written about Jesus so what's the difference?

Re: nayrt

[(Anonymous)]

da One group goes to the discussion with the belief that Jesus lived, died, came back and was the son of God. The other doesn't. That's a pretty big difference.

Re: nayrt

[(Anonymous)]

Like I said both groups have written extensively about Jesus. So scholars and historians are both interchangeable for this argument.

Re: nayrt

[(Anonymous)]

They're really not though, because the original argument was about whether or not Jesus is accepted as a real historical figure. The writings of religious scholars don't really matter for that because they start out accepting that Jesus is real, and filter evidence through that lens.