[ SECRET POST #3014 ]

[case]

⌈ Secret Post #3014 ⌋

Warning: Some secrets are NOT worksafe and may contain SPOILERS.

01.


__________________________________________________



02.


__________________________________________________



03.


__________________________________________________



04.


__________________________________________________



05.


__________________________________________________



06.


__________________________________________________



07.


__________________________________________________



08.


__________________________________________________



09.


__________________________________________________



10.


__________________________________________________



11.


__________________________________________________



12.


__________________________________________________



13.


__________________________________________________



14.


__________________________________________________



15.


__________________________________________________



16.


__________________________________________________



17.


__________________________________________________



18.


__________________________________________________



19. [repeat]


__________________________________________________



20. [repeat]


__________________________________________________



21.


__________________________________________________



22.


__________________________________________________



23.









Notes:

Secrets Left to Post: 06 pages, 130 secrets from Secret Submission Post #431.
Secrets Not Posted: [ 0 - broken links ], [ 0 - not!secrets ], [ 0 - not!fandom ], [ 0 - too big ], [ 0 - repeat ].
Current Secret Submissions Post: here.
Suggestions, comments, and concerns should go here.

Comments

[(Anonymous)]

She purchased some paintings by Walter Sickert (her suspect for Jack the Ripper), which were quite valuable in their own right, and then took them apart to test for fingerprints and DNA.

http://www.theguardian.com/artanddesign/2001/dec/08/art.artsfeatures

It was pretty dumb, tbh. It's been over 125 years, everything that could possibly be related to the murders or Jack the Ripper has not been preserved properly and has been handled by countless people. The DNA contamination has probably rendered any evidence worthless, so there isn't much point in destroying anything just to test for DNA.

[(Anonymous)]

It's the CSI effect: nobody believes anything now unless they have DNA evidence and apparently that evidence is everywhere and easy to test!

[(Anonymous)]

Haha, I know, right? In that video someone else linked to, they actually dusted the frame of one of the paintings for fingerprints. When you think of how many people may have handled that over the decades, it's like jesus, why bother?

[diet_poison]

That's pretty sad, tbh. :/