case: (Default)
Case ([personal profile] case) wrote in [community profile] fandomsecrets2015-04-05 03:44 pm

[ SECRET POST #3014 ]


⌈ Secret Post #3014 ⌋

Warning: Some secrets are NOT worksafe and may contain SPOILERS.

01.


__________________________________________________



02.


__________________________________________________



03.


__________________________________________________



04.


__________________________________________________



05.


__________________________________________________



06.


__________________________________________________



07.


__________________________________________________



08.


__________________________________________________



09.


__________________________________________________



10.


__________________________________________________



11.


__________________________________________________



12.


__________________________________________________



13.


__________________________________________________



14.


__________________________________________________



15.


__________________________________________________



16.


__________________________________________________



17.


__________________________________________________



18.


__________________________________________________



19. [repeat]


__________________________________________________



20. [repeat]


__________________________________________________



21.


__________________________________________________



22.


__________________________________________________



23.









Notes:

Secrets Left to Post: 06 pages, 130 secrets from Secret Submission Post #431.
Secrets Not Posted: [ 0 - broken links ], [ 0 - not!secrets ], [ 0 - not!fandom ], [ 0 - too big ], [ 0 - repeat ].
Current Secret Submissions Post: here.
Suggestions, comments, and concerns should go here.

(Anonymous) 2015-04-05 11:06 pm (UTC)(link)
To be fair, she did stake her reputation on it even if it was just her reputation as a writer of semi-decent fiction. Now we are mocking her, and her stories. She lost exactly what she said she was prepared to lose.

(Anonymous) 2015-04-05 11:24 pm (UTC)(link)
Yes, I suppose. I think it was foolish to stake her reputation on it in the first place, though. Barring some miraculous new discovery of evidence, we'll never know for sure who Jack the Ripper was. All the evidence and theories have been discussed to death for over a century by everyone from amateur scholars to the FBI, and since the answer will likely be permanently elusive, there'll never be a vindication for anyone.

In other words, there's nothing to stake upon, because we'll never know. Claiming otherwise is pointless.

(Anonymous) 2015-04-06 12:07 pm (UTC)(link)
"In other words, there's nothing to stake upon, because we'll never know. Claiming otherwise is pointless."

Yeah, I remember thinking that, too. It was kind of ridiculous.