[ SECRET POST #3014 ]

[case]

⌈ Secret Post #3014 ⌋

Warning: Some secrets are NOT worksafe and may contain SPOILERS.

01.


__________________________________________________



02.


__________________________________________________



03.


__________________________________________________



04.


__________________________________________________



05.


__________________________________________________



06.


__________________________________________________



07.


__________________________________________________



08.


__________________________________________________



09.


__________________________________________________



10.


__________________________________________________



11.


__________________________________________________



12.


__________________________________________________



13.


__________________________________________________



14.


__________________________________________________



15.


__________________________________________________



16.


__________________________________________________



17.


__________________________________________________



18.


__________________________________________________



19. [repeat]


__________________________________________________



20. [repeat]


__________________________________________________



21.


__________________________________________________



22.


__________________________________________________



23.









Notes:

Secrets Left to Post: 06 pages, 130 secrets from Secret Submission Post #431.
Secrets Not Posted: [ 0 - broken links ], [ 0 - not!secrets ], [ 0 - not!fandom ], [ 0 - too big ], [ 0 - repeat ].
Current Secret Submissions Post: here.
Suggestions, comments, and concerns should go here.

Comments

Re: piling on some more I guess

[(Anonymous)]

I still consider myself sex positive, but a lot of sex positive people have definitely gone right over the deep end. There's no willingness to actually think critically about things at all. And it's like, guys, sure, sex is great and people should not be shamed for liking it or having it, but just like with anything else, there can be bad things about it and it can be used in bad ways.

Re: piling on some more I guess

[scrubber]

I find some aspects of sex-positivism worthwhile, but ultimately I think it's handicapped by a flawed premise. It's one of those accepted Liberalisms that America is some kind of giant Shaker commune where the powers that be ONLY pressure woman to live up to the image of a pure, virginal, asexual mother-type of woman. This is a gross simplification of sexual... I don't fucking know, politics? Culture? In America and pretending that that's all there is to it creates these reactionary schools of thought like sex-positivity that are genuinely willing to lavish praise on any kind of expression of sexuality as revolutionary without analyzing the underlying motives and purpose of the act. All it ever seems to do in practice is shut down discussion, so what's the point? And that's before we talk about the movement being co-opted by creeps and look at how it intersects with race.

It's all incredibly masturbatory (har), even when it's not just outright offensive.

Re: piling on some more I guess

[(Anonymous)]

Yeah, thinking about it (largely because of this thread), I kind of feel like, while I still think the basic idea makes sense & I'm comfortable with it being a sort of reflexive position, I'm not sure it makes sense as an identity or a movement more broadly.

Re: piling on some more I guess

[scrubber]

That's how I've come to feel. It's given me some food for thought, but I'm tired of eating the same thing over and over again and so I'm moving on now.

Re: piling on some more I guess

[(Anonymous)]

That's a good point, because there definitely is the opposite pressure. Once in a committed relationship, women are often expected to be completely sexually available, to the point where women with low libido are made to feel broken.

Sex positivity should be as much about being able to say "no" as it is about dating "yes," but it's usually not. And I do agree it tends to take a view that's way too simplistic.