[ SECRET POST #3027 ]

[case]

⌈ Secret Post #3027 ⌋

Warning: Some secrets are NOT worksafe and may contain SPOILERS.

01.


__________________________________________________



02.


__________________________________________________



03.


__________________________________________________



04.


__________________________________________________



05.


__________________________________________________



06.


__________________________________________________



07.


__________________________________________________



08.


__________________________________________________



09.


__________________________________________________



10.


__________________________________________________



11.


__________________________________________________



12.


__________________________________________________



13.


__________________________________________________



14.


__________________________________________________



15.


__________________________________________________



16.











Notes:

Secrets Left to Post: 04 pages, 099 secrets from Secret Submission Post #433.
Secrets Not Posted: [ 0 - broken links ], [ 0 - not!secrets ], [ 0 - not!fandom ], [ 0 - too big ], [ 0 - repeat ].
Current Secret Submissions Post: here.
Suggestions, comments, and concerns should go here.

Comments

Re: A relatively "balanced" article

[feotakahari]

"None of this is infringing on free speech, and making it about free speech creates a paradox. If criticizing someone's speech (in this case Frank Cho's art) is an attempt to suppress it, then, by that very same definition, criticizing someone's speech (in this case criticism of Frank Cho's art) must also be an attempt to suppress it. Frank Cho's art isn't inherently more important than the reaction to that art, or any more deserving of protection."

Re: A relatively "balanced" article

[(Anonymous)]

I apologise.