case: (Default)
Case ([personal profile] case) wrote in [community profile] fandomsecrets2015-04-20 06:48 pm

[ SECRET POST #3029 ]


⌈ Secret Post #3029 ⌋

Warning: Some secrets are NOT worksafe and may contain SPOILERS.

01.


__________________________________________________



02.
[Peep Show]


__________________________________________________



03.
[Indiana Jones and the Fate of Atlantis]


__________________________________________________



04.
[Alexis Denisof]


__________________________________________________



05.
[Guardians of the Galaxy]



__________________________________________________



08.
[John Green]


__________________________________________________



09.
[Outlander]


__________________________________________________



10.
[Selfie]


__________________________________________________



11.
[Emilio Estevez]


__________________________________________________



12.
[His Dark Materials]


__________________________________________________



13.
[Star Wars, Twilight]


__________________________________________________



14.
[Faux Pas]


__________________________________________________



15.
[Mass Effect]


__________________________________________________



16.
[The Black Lillies]










Notes:

Secrets Left to Post: 03 pages, 067 secrets from Secret Submission Post #433.
Secrets Not Posted: [ 0 - broken links ], [ 0 - not!secrets ], [ 0 - not!fandom ], [ 0 - too big ], [ 0 - repeat ].
Current Secret Submissions Post: here.
Suggestions, comments, and concerns should go here.

da

(Anonymous) 2015-04-21 12:40 am (UTC)(link)
I don't think anyone's disputing the fact that both sides of that particular issue can be complete assholes, just taking issue with the source. There are some corners of the internet that aren't worth giving traffic to, even on the once-in-a-blue-moon occasions when they manage to get something right, rather than obfuscating and blowing things out of proportion.
chardmonster: (Default)

Re: da

[personal profile] chardmonster 2015-04-21 04:43 am (UTC)(link)
"I'm not disputing the fact that both sides of a particular issue can be complete assholes, just taking issue with the idea that I should believe a woman who disagrees with me could ever deserve sympathy for a type of harassment I know damn well is very common at conventions. I for some reason think hits on a reddit board matter."
Edited 2015-04-21 04:44 (UTC)

(Anonymous) 2015-04-21 04:56 pm (UTC)(link)
Actually, no. I take no issue with the idea that someone involved in a debate I don't really give a fuck about deserves sympathy for being harassed. Con harassment happens, and anyone who's the target of it deserves sympathy, just as anyone who perpetrates it deserves to be thrown out on their ass.

I just don't think Kotaku in Action is a reasonable source of news, any more than I'd find a Daily Mail article about harassment a reasonable source.
blitzwing: ([magi] Jafar)

[personal profile] blitzwing 2015-04-21 05:10 pm (UTC)(link)
You have got to be trolling. They teach the difference between primary and secondary sources in high school.