Case (![[personal profile]](https://www.dreamwidth.org/img/silk/identity/user.png)
case) wrote in ![[community profile]](https://www.dreamwidth.org/img/silk/identity/community.png)
fandomsecrets2015-04-20 06:48 pm
case) wrote in fandomsecrets2015-04-20 06:48 pm
[ SECRET POST #3029 ]
⌈ Secret Post #3029 ⌋
Warning: Some secrets are NOT worksafe and may contain SPOILERS.
01.
__________________________________________________
02.
[Peep Show]
__________________________________________________
03.
[Indiana Jones and the Fate of Atlantis]
__________________________________________________
04.
[Alexis Denisof]
__________________________________________________
05.
[Guardians of the Galaxy]
__________________________________________________
08.
[John Green]
__________________________________________________
09.
[Outlander]
__________________________________________________
10.
[Selfie]
__________________________________________________
11.
[Emilio Estevez]
__________________________________________________
12.
[His Dark Materials]
__________________________________________________
13.
[Star Wars, Twilight]
__________________________________________________
14.
[Faux Pas]
__________________________________________________
15.
[Mass Effect]
__________________________________________________
16.
[The Black Lillies]
Notes:
Secrets Left to Post: 03 pages, 067 secrets from Secret Submission Post #433.
Secrets Not Posted: [ 0 - broken links ], [ 0 - not!secrets ], [ 0 - not!fandom ], [ 0 - too big ], [ 0 - repeat ].
Current Secret Submissions Post: here.
Suggestions, comments, and concerns should go here.
Re: Calgary Expo Vs MRA women
They're not like secondary sources, where you try to weed out the bad by sticking to reputable publishers and peer-reviewed journals. A primary source isn't an academic work--it's often a personal accounting. Something written on a napkin, or scrawled on a bathroom stall in poop can be a valid primary source.
You look to other primary sources to corroborate the validity of the primary source. For instance, the tweet of that guy saying he almost felt bad about flipping off the Vivian James cosplayer--that's another primary source that confirms that there *was* a Vivian James cosplayer at that con, and she did receive negative attention.
The tweet being from someone who is the ideological opposite of the KiA people even serves to help negate the required concerns about bias in the accounting.
In other words, all you've shown is that you don't understand how sources work. You'll have to find another excuse to derail the conversation and take the focus off of the woman who was victimized.